×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PE license by exam????
4

PE license by exam????

PE license by exam????

(OP)
Someone asked me the other day if my PE was "by exam".  How the heck else can one earn a PE license?  I understand and have gotten a license in other states "by comity" but I do not know of any other way to get that first license other than taking the test.

RE: PE license by exam????

A long time ago you could buy a P.E. license from Vermont and from Washington, D.C. This is what I've heard from the old guys in the office (those who are older than 60).

There's a lot of old bad blood surrounding this issue. Every now and then there's an anecdote about one of the "Green Mountain Boys" in management who would proudly display his purchased Vermont P.E. license - though he was working nearly exclusively in New York, and the sum of his work consisted of project management and planning. ...the geezer telling the story was kind of ticked that he spent six months prepping for the exam...

I suspect that there are countries with boards of engineers who award the P.E. or similar based on demonstrated experience/excellence, just not in the US and Canada and the UK.

I don't see anything wrong with boards of experienced graybeards evaluating an engineer's work and declaring him/her as "one of us." But I sure do see the logistical and beaurocratic nightmarish experience this would be.

RE: PE license by exam????

Many states "grandfathered" practicing engineers (without exams) who met various combinations of education and work experience. This was phased out in South Carolina in the 1970's.

For more on current requirements, on a state by state basis, see the link at this FAQ765-1162

www.SlideRuleEra.net

RE: PE license by exam????

I would agree with vooter. Several old timers that I know of had obtained their PE license years ago by simply graduating from an accredited four year engineering college and submitting an application for licensure after x years of work experience.

RE: PE license by exam????

I think that the examples above were all transitional steps from free-market to government oversight of certain engineering functions.  A guy I know (about 55 years old) got his PE in Texas when they first formed the board of licensure.  He only had to show his acredited degree and document his 5 years experience.  This probably took place in the late '70's or early '80's.  Now he has a PE in Texas that is not transferable to any other state.

In about 10-15 more years all of the transitional PE's will be out of the profession and every PE in the US will have taken the exams.  People will still be having this discussion for another 50 years beyond that.

David

RE: PE license by exam????

Texas until fairly recently did not require a written exam. Getting a PE in Texas was then viewed as getting the good old boys to let you in the club. I met and worked with many engineers from Texas that were good but there must have been some duds out there.
 I think they went to an exam because many Texas PEs were being refused comity in other states and to improve their image.  

RE: PE license by exam????

BJC - how long ago is "recently"?  I don't personally know of a PE within the last ten years who hasn't gotten their PE by exam.

Now, as far as I know, Texas does still have a waiver for the exam, but to even get considered for that, you've got to have a qualifying degree and twelve years of experience, along with nine letters of recommendation instead of the usual five.  And, even at that, you wouldn't be able to get a PE in another state by reciprocity/comity if you didn't have the exam.

Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas

"All the world is a Spring"

All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.

RE: PE license by exam????

I was originally licensed in Texas in 1985 - not with an exam, but with an accredited degree (I actually had an M.S. in structural) and a minimum of 4 years of experience which had to be documented well beyond what other states require.

In fact, I couldn't even take the PE exam UNTIL I got licensed there.

After getting the PE, I then took the PE test, passed it, and then eventually moved to another state.  I have had no problem whatsoever getting comity in the 20 other states in which I'm licensed.  So as long as you take the test, you can get comity.  But if you got your Texas PE and then never took the test, the other states would see that you didn't meet THEIR minimum criteria and deny the license.  This sort of thing is true everywhere - that states will not accept comity if your "home" state doesn't have the same requirements as they do.

RE: PE license by exam????

I find the whole process bizarre.  In Canada if you graduate from an accredited program you meet the acedemic requirements.  If you don't you can challenge the exams (up to 14)as assigned by the Society to prove equivalence provided you graduated from an Engineering discipline.

In my case I took a 3 year Engineering course and got a Diploma.  In the US it would be an Associate Degree.  I challeneged 12 exams succesfully and have 10 years experience.  I expect my PE by spring.

Texas won't recognize my PE even though there is an agreement to recognize PE's from my province because I do not have a Degree.  Other states will.

I don't need it for my employment here.  So whatever.  But it is a messed up system that has transfer agreements that don't mean squat.

I could probably go down the road and by a degree by taking some humanities course or such and that would be okay.

RE: PE license by exam????

I'm working at getting licensed in New York State.  As far as I can tell, the only thing my Texas (exam-based) PE is good for is the exam, nothing more.  I still need to have a statement from my accredited BS institution, and I still need to document my experience.  It doesn't matter that I already had to do all that to get my Texas PE.

I'm not all that happy about this, and not just because it's a pain in the patootie.  To document the experience I have to get my boss and my boss's boss (a.k.a. my ex-boss) to sign a piece of paper that implies rather strongly that I'm looking elsewhere.  I tell them all the time that I'm looking elsewhere, but in the back of their minds they still tell themselves I don't really mean it.  Taking steps to get licensed elsewhere is a pretty strong statement of lack of commitment to staying here, and might hurt my chances of promotion & raises.  Sure, I can say I'm keeping my possibilities open, looking a few years down the road, and it'll be true, but it'll raise some eyebrows.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376

RE: PE license by exam????

HGTX,

can you just get an ncees record. that way you can tell your boss you are simply doing it incase you need it. then transfer the experiance record to ny via the records program. it is more expensive but may be politically better

RE: PE license by exam????

HgTX,
The NCEES route is the one I took when I was trying to decide if I could make it on my own.  My management was really supportive of my getting a NCEES record.  I don't know that all bosses suffer from the magnitude of tunnel vision that mine did, but I've rarely seen a boss that didn't have a bit of that affliction.  The biggest downside to the NCEES record is having to get another PE to write you a reference every year verifying one more year of experience.

It really does make the whole comity thing a lot easier.

David

RE: PE license by exam????

Thanks!  I didn't even know about that.  Yeah, it sounds more neutral than a form for a particular state.

I'm still irritated at having to go through it all again...

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376

RE: PE license by exam????

Why do we even put up with the various boards requirements for reciprocity?  Can anyone tell me of a federal law that allows the states this authority?  The U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 1, states: “Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”.  
    This explicitly prohibits the states from setting any requirements for reciprocity.  Each state may set their own requirements for licensure but MUST accept the license of any other state.  Only Congress has this authority and, to my knowledge, has not used it for engineering or other professional licensure. Can anyone show me how this is legal?

RE: PE license by exam????

No, not true. The States establish their own Constitution and regulate what happens in their own Jurisdiction(s). This is no different than States establishing requirements for local taxation and home rule laws.

RE: PE license by exam????

The Texas rules changed in 1992.  I think that someone in Texas with an engineering degree from an accredite Texas university could become registered without an exam.  The waiver mentioned for those with experience appropriate to the board applies to the Fundamentals of Engineering exam.  There may be some deal for university professors.  I will check the new rule changes as it is renewal time.

John

RE: PE license by exam????

In Alberta, Canada, "The Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Professions Act" is a piece of Provincial legislation. The other provinces have their own act. I do not know how it works in the territories.

Hence, PE fall under Provincial jurisdiction, and you need to be accredited in each province that you work in.

RE: PE license by exam????

As of January 1, 2006, Texas will only grant PE exam waivers to people who hold PhDs and have 4-6 years of creditable experience, and to people who are licensed in other jurisdictions who have 12 years of creditable experience.  In addition, they have to have their application in by the end of this year.  Everyone else (and everyone who applies starting in Jan.) MUST take, or have taken, the PE exam.  I'm glad to see we're getting serious.

As for State vs. Federal, the 10th Amendment reads: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."  That says that States get to set their own rules.  Article IV, as I read it, says that CA, for example, must honor rulings in TX--e.g.,  CA cannot protect a fugitive found guilty in TX even if the particular crime is not illegal in CA.  I'm not a Constitutional scholar, by any stretch, but when you apply Art. IV to licenses, you delve into a whole host of issues, material for a different forum.

On a separate, but related, note:  what seal is required for Federal work, like on military installations?

RE: PE license by exam????

Quote:

On a separate, but related, note:  what seal is required for Federal work, like on military installations?

On federal work - no seal is usually required unless the department requires one.  I've designed Corps of Engineer plans without any seal (like for Dept. of Defense work) and on others I've simply placed my home state seal to simply show that I am licensed somewhere...which was the main requirement for the project anyway.

Only in a few cases, when there's time, will I actually get the local state license simply as a matter of form, not for a legal requirement.

RE: PE license by exam????

    Thank you, Metengr for your comment.  I will agree that if the engineer/firm has an office in the state in question, then that state has the authority to require registration, but not if the engineer/firm is only providing its service/product across state lines.   Taxes are not applied to items coming in from another state. The various states accept driver’s licenses, marriage licenses, etc., from other states.
 
    The states have no authority to establish reciprocity agreements, and are explicitly prohibited from doing so without the consent of congress (a federal law that allows them to do so). I site the following excerpts from the U.S. Constitiution as my reference:

Section I article 8:  The Congress shall have Power…To regulate Commerce … among the several States, …
Section I article 9: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another….

Section I article 10: “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress … enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State ….

Amendment 10: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
    
   I repeat my question, can anyone tell me of a federal law that allows the states this authority?   

RE: PE license by exam????

Suggest you review the web site below for more information. The creation and regulation of PE licenses is no different than the creation of licenses for medical doctors, lawyers or other professions.

http://www.ncees.org/introduction/about_ncees/history.php

RE: PE license by exam????

   I completely agree that, from a legal standpoint, there is no difference between the licensing processes for the various professions.  NCEES has a very nice mission/goal in attempting to standardize the various state laws, but NCEES is a private organization and has no standing to make federal law.  States may require occupational licenses for those within their state; they shall not require practitioners from another state to acquire a license in their state.  Of course, if the professional in question has a physical location in multiple states then he must comply with the licensing regulations of each.
   I realize the states have been doing this for years but that does not mean that it is lawful for them to do so.  Unless the US congress passes (or passed one that I have been unable to find) a law allowing the states to regulate interstate professional services, then reciprocity laws are illegal.

RE: PE license by exam????

While I don't necessarily agree with you, Tomcat, I see your point.  In that light, I submit the following counters (please keep in mind, this is not an attack, nor am I arguing with you--this is an intellectual exercise):

Reciprocity/comity laws are not illegal, because they are not agreements between states.  They are laws enacted by an individual state, applying only to that state, recognizing that other states have licensing requirements sufficiently similar to their own.  It is nothing more than a way of streamlining the licensure process--the applicant has already met the requirements, so he/she need not be thoroughly reviewed again.  And in every state, you still must demonstrate to that state that you meet their minimum requirements.

It is the duty of states to protect their citizens.  Pursuant to that duty is the right to regulate the practice of engineering, a right granted to the states by the 10th Amendment.  Licensing of engineers is less about trade and commerce than about protecting the public.  Therefore, I believe if it were challenged, the state’s duty to protect its citizens would take precedence over the Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce.

To look at it another way, I’m sure our CA friends would be offended at the notion that the aforementioned “Green Mountain Boys”, with their “bought” licenses, should be allowed to design a building on a CA fault.

RE: PE license by exam????

Addendum:  My previous post does not address temporary permits, which are granted by some states based solely on the applicant being licensed in another state.  That runs counter to my argument, and I have no answer.  Hmmmm. . . .

RE: PE license by exam????

  Hi rholder98. I certainly do not see your comments as an attack, and personally, I enjoy a friendly argument!  Of course, I also realize I am fighting a losing battle with my argument.  The practice (of requiring licensure in multiple states) has been going on for years and the states receive revenue from the various professional license taxes.   
  I am certainly not a lawyer but I certainly thought that reciprocity laws were agreements or compacts between states.  Is there any case where State "A" accepts the license of State "B" but "B" does not accept "A"'s?   
  I do not recall a duty of the states to protect their citizens.  Could you provide a situation?  Shouldn't this concern for safety also apply to drivers licenses?  After all a person from rural West Texas (such as myself) couldn't be expected to handle the traffic congestion of say New York or California.

  

RE: PE license by exam????

Oops, I intended to ask if you could provide a citation of the law in the second sentance of my last paragraph.

RE: PE license by exam????

Tomcat699 - All of the comity laws in the various states are independent of the other states.  In other words, there is no agreement between states (I'll accept your PE's if you accept ours).  

Each state simply reviews the qualifications of the state the applicant is coming from and, if similar or greater than their own, they accept those qualifications simply to streamline the process of licensure.  

I also suggest that your view that -the states can't do such and such without the feds approval-  actually should be reversed.  The US constitution relegates most autonomy to the states, reserving only directly specified functions to the feds. (I think its the 10th amendment).  This was explained to me by someone some time ago.  

Similar concept to driver's licenses...states do all the licensing, get all the fees, but allow out-of-state drivers to drive with their out-of-state licenses.

RE: PE license by exam????

Tomcat's point struck a chord with me so I looked at the U.S. Constitution (novel idea, I know) at http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution_transcript.html.  I don't see how the states get around:

Quote:


Article. IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

The nice thing about this version of the Constitution is they've highlighted any part that has been modified or superseeded by amendments and Article IV, Section 1 has not bee modified.

That seems to say that if New Mexico has a "public Act" that defines the requirements for designation as a PE, and I meet those requirements and am designated as a PE in New Mexico, then no other state can say I'm not a PE.

Maybe I'm just being too literal here.

David

RE: PE license by exam????

David,

Perhaps you are basically correct here, that the states should and must allow comity when the license requirements are equal.  But this still doesn't mean that the state doesn't have the right/obligation to review your qualifications, and then charge you a fee to administer that license.  

RE: PE license by exam????

If you have a PE is one state, you are a PE regardless of where you are.  However, unless you are a PE in a particular state, that state can prohibit you from offering engineering services to the public in that state.  Each state can independently regulate the practice of engineering within the borders of that state.  Engineering for something to be constructed within the state, a building, a bridge, whatever, can be regulated by that state even if the actual engineering happens to be done elsewhere.

RE: PE license by exam????

JAE,
I'm not seeing it.  Until recently you could get a drivers licence in New Mexico at 14 years old.  A friend's son did that and then a few days later got a ticket in Colorado (minimum age 16) for speeding.  His ticket was for speeding, not underage driving because Colorado had to honor a valid New Mexico dirvers license.

Each state has the right and obligation to develop standards for performance of a licensed task (like practicing medicine, driving a vehicle, or practicing engineering), but don't they also have to give "full faith and Credit" to someone who satisfied the legal requirements of another state?

David

RE: PE license by exam????

davidbeach,

I seem to recall a case where a PE, licensed in State A, stamped an engineering report, or maybe he merely signed the cover letter as John Doe, PE, for a project in State B.  This person was not licensed in State B.  Someone in State B reported him to the PE Board for falsely representing himself as a PE.  I think the Board found him guilty, and likely assessed a fine.

I think this was presented in Alfred Pagan's column in CE News Magazine about a year or two ago.  I don't remember the outcome, however.  I DO remember, though, thinking that I would have to careful with how I represent myself in the future.


RE: PE license by exam????

That scenario has played out several times over.  Those that receive the TX newsletter can read dozens of stories where a firm was fined because it listed as one of its employees, "John Doe, P.E.", where John Doe was licensed in a different state.

I live in Texas.  Why don't I pay state income taxes?  It's the law in Ohio (and numerous others).  Why doesn't my car have to meet CA emissions standards?  States set their own laws.  "Full faith and credit" means states have to respect each other's laws, not adopt them.  Texas cannot prevent me from practicing in Oklahoma.

As for the drivers license thing, I think it's more of an issue of states choosing to honor, rather than having to honor, each other's licenses.  It is simply not practical to require a new drivers license for each state you plan to visit.  Nevertheless, a state could choose to enforce just that.  If New Mexico suddenly allowed 12 year olds to drive, I think Colorado would be reluctant to allow that.  The scope and extent of "Full faith and credit" will soon be clearly defined, I think, with the whole marriage license issue (social issue--not for this forum).

RE: PE license by exam????

"Each state has the right and obligation to develop standards for performance of a licensed task (like practicing medicine, driving a vehicle, or practicing engineering), but don't they also have to give "full faith and Credit" to someone who satisfied the legal requirements of another state?"


No. If you review the Professional Engineering Act in most, if not all, States the introduction of the Act states the purpose which is to protect the health, welfare and safety of the Public. The Act creates a licensing board composed of “x” number of individuals charged with granting licensure based on specific requirements. This public act is law and approved by the State Legislature. States are not obligated to regulate Professions, they choose to do so.  Most States have a Department that is called Professional Regulation. A driver’s license and fishing license do not fall under this category. States regulate their own requirements and limitations for these types of licenses for their residents, and non-residents. A marriage license is like a birth certificate or death certificate and would be a matter of pubic record for the State and would fall under Article IV, Section I of the US constitution.

Reciprocity of Professional Engineering licenses lies with the Professional Licensing Board of each State, as provided by the rules of the Professional Engineering Act. As such, Licensing Boards have significant latitude in determining licensing requirements to assure protection of public health, welfare and safety. If a Board so chooses, they could grant reciprocity from another State. Licensing Boards are obligated to review a submittal for licensure to practice engineering in their particular State. If you fulfill the licensing requirements imposed by the Board, you are granted a license to practice engineering.

RE: PE license by exam????

JAE, I normally would agree with you on the states rights superseding the feds.  In this case, the 10th amendment actually prohibits the states from action.  At least by my interpretation of Article I, Sections, 8, 9, and 10 and Article IV section 1 of the US Constitution.
   Crossframe, I suspect the engineer in question also was fined by his state board as well.  At least that’s the way Texas does it (Texas Administrative Code, Title 22, Part 6, Chapter 137, Subchapter C, §137.65).
   I think this issue would have to be tried in a  Federal court to be resolved.

RE: PE license by exam????

Rholder98, you don’t have to pay income taxes in Ohio, et al, because you do not live in Ohio.  You don’t have to pay even if you travel to, through, or even do some business in, Ohio.  Same answer for the CA emissions.  You may still drive your non-CA emissions car in CA.  
  If an engineer/firm has a office/facility in a state, then he must comply with that states license law, just as a retail company would have to collect sales taxes in any state they have a “brick and mortar” location.  I cannot see any legal standing in preventing an engineer or company from offering his services or products across state lines.
  Yes, the states do it and have for years but that doesn’t mean it’s correct or legal.  

RE: PE license by exam????

True, Tomcat699, and good points.  California will let me drive my car there, but with the understanding that it is for a fixed length of time, after which I will either a) go back home, or b) conform to CA's regulations in order to extend my stay for an indefinite period of time.  That's kind of like the basis for temporary permits, wouldn't you agree?

But the point I was trying to make is that a broad interpretation of the "full faith and credit" clause, taken to the extreme, would mean that any law ("public Act") passed in one state has to be enforced by all states.  That would defeat the concept of state autonomy.  

I contend that a state gets to regulate what goes on within its borders (take speed limits, for example).  Like davidbeach said earlier, regardless of where the calculations are performed, or the drawings produced, the end product of engineering takes place within the borders of a state, and is subject to that state's regulations.

Clearly, there is a line somewhere, and the question at hand is, "Where is that line?".  That will have to be determined by people far more intelligent than I.  Till then, I just play by the rules as I know them.

RE: PE license by exam????

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In other words, if the constitution doesn't specifically grant the feds a power, they don't have it...and the states keep the power.

Yes, this has been violated many times (try to find the Dept. of Education in the constitution).  But its still the basis of our country - we are the United States....not a federal country managed by local governments.  Each state has an autonomy, the likes of which is not found in other country's governmental forms.

Article I, Section 8 - To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
Hmmm...not sure how this applies to engineering unless you see that an engineer in state X wants to practice in state Y and that is a form of commerce.  But licensing an engineer by state Y is simply their way of ENSURING that the engineer is indeed adequate to the task via the license in state X - nothing in that that violates this section in my view.

Article I, Section. 9. - I don't see anything in this one

Article I, Section 10 - No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
Engineering practice is not an import of a product.  It is the practice of a professional service.  Don't see how this applies either.


Article. IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.


This applies to "public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings".  I don't see how licensing engineers, or requiring a fee to license engineers, violates this section.  Is licensing of engineers a "public act" of a state in the sense given here?  Perhaps.  But even so, if the engineer is qualified to practice engineering to the level required by the state, then comity is allowed.  So the mere presence of comity means that they ARE providing for the full faith and credit of the other state.  

The difference sometimes shows up in the fact that some states may perceive a unique requirement to practice in their state that is above and beyond the other state.  California with high seismic, Illinois with high seismic, Alaska with perma-frost, etc.  These are not denying full faith and credit, simply ensuring public safety.

That's my take on it - but as you can easily see...I'm an engineer - not a lawyer.

RE: PE license by exam????

I apologize in advance for the long post.  Thank you too all that are participating in it.  While I don’t expect to change anything in the law, this discussion is really helping me to understand the various aspects of the issue.

    I agree with Rholder98 that the states may regulate what goes on within their borders.  The problem occurs when the state tries to regulate what goes on beyond its borders.  Take the California emissions regulations of vehicles as an example.  I think most of us would agree that there is certainly a great deal of engineering involved in this product and it certainly can affect the individual and public safety.  Fortunately, CA will allow outsiders to visit in substandard vehicles but they really don’t have to, at least not by anything I can find in the law.   In other words, I believe that CA has the legal authority to allow only certain vehicles that meet CA’s standards to be operated within its borders.   
On the other hand, I do not believe that CA has the authority to require that the engineers designing the vehicle must be licensed in CA.  Nor do the assemblers have to belong to CA union or meet CA’s labor laws.  
    Merenger brings up an excellent point in that the “Professional Engineering Act in most, if not all, States the introduction of the Act states the purpose which is to protect the health, welfare and safety of the Public.”, and certainly it is within the states rights to do this.  (So why will CA allow visitors to bring substandard vehicles into its borders and endanger the public?  Hum?)  Again, I agree that the state has the authority to enforce standards of design and construction for products within its borders.  If the engineer/firm has a physical location within the state, then the engineer/firm falls under the states authority.
     If a bridge or multistory building is built on site in the state of “X”, then “X” has the authority to require that its design codes, inspection laws, material specifications, welding certifications and labor laws be met.  
     If the bridge is built in another state and shipped to “X”, then “X” may require the bridge to meet all of “X”’s requirements, but it has lost the ability to enforce its inspection and labor laws during the construction phase unless specified in the contract.
     I just cannot see how “X” can require a citizen of another state, that never even steps across the border, must be licensed in “X’.  
     I am also unconvinced that professional licensure is not a public act and thus outside the scope of Article IV.  I am required by law to have the license to practice.  My name, address, telephone number, discipline, license number, date of issue and date of expiration are all listed on the state board’s website. How much more public can it get?
    As I interpret the “full faith and credit” clause, all the states must accept and recognize the laws, records and proceedings of the other states.  Another state may not send a rescue party to Texas to free our death row inmates. All states accept the marriage and drivers licenses of the other states.  Companies do not have to file for incorporation in each state in which they provide a service or sell a product.
    JAE, I’m not sure what you mean regarding the 10th Amendment.  Yes, it provides that the states or the people have all the power unless they are specifically granted to the feds or prohibited to the states.  
  As for weather the practice of engineering is a form commerce, I would guess that greater than 90% of engineering is performed for a business purpose or some kind of remuneration and thus commerce.  Perhaps I am being too literal here but that would be my justification for referencing Article I sections 8-10
    In closing this long post, I can’t pass up excerpting my fine states law on comity. ...the board has reviewed the licensing requirements of the jurisdictions listed in this paragraph and has found them to be substantially equivalent to the requirements in Texas. ... The board does not recognize any U.S. state or territory for reciprocity or comity at this time.

RE: PE license by exam????

"The problem occurs when the state tries to regulate what goes on beyond its borders."

Exactly.  Texas cannot tell me I'm qualified--or not--to design a building in California.  Texas is only concerned with what gets built within its own borders.  But the building/bridge you mentioned falls under the jurisdiction of the state in which it is ultimately located, where it will be used by the public.  States don't try to regulate who can practice engineering elsewhere--they regulate who can practice engineering in their own jurisdiction.

This has been a lot of fun.  I enjoy having to think.  How about this from the 14th Amendment:  "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall. . .deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."  So if state A says that state B's engineers may automatically practice in state A, isn't A denying equal protection to A's own engineers?  Isn't A denying equal protection to the users of the B engineers' designs?  We could go on all day.

I guess it all boils down to "Full faith and credit..." vs. the 10th Amendment.  The funny thing is that this whole issue was probably dealt with and decided a long time ago.

RE: PE license by exam????

The 10th amendment is probably the least followed of all the amendments.  The federal gov't has slowly crept into almost every aspect of our lives.  Not what the original founding fathers envisioned at all.  

And thus, the concept of the 10th - that the federal government is limited in its powers and the default should always go to the states, has been lost on much of the public.

We're like frogs in water that's gradually brought up to boiling.

RE: PE license by exam????

But the argument in this thread is the opposite--that the states are taking a power the Constitution does not allow them to have.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376

RE: PE license by exam????

But my argument is that the constitution, by its very form, doesn't even need to address states powers because the 10th amendment defaults everything to the states except what is specifically given to the feds.

The constitution doesn't simply dish out portions of power between the states and the feds.  It assumes that the states have ALL the power, and explicitly limits the powers given to the feds.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources