×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mobile Equipment Air Compressor Performance

Mobile Equipment Air Compressor Performance

Mobile Equipment Air Compressor Performance

(OP)
I am trying to compare the performance of turbo-boosted (TB) vs. naturally aspirated (NA) air compressors.  I am working on an engine upgrade on a piece of construction equipment which currently has a TB air compressor used to operate system brakes as well as additional auxiliary functions.  Unfortunately the engines from which I have to choose do not offer a TB air compressor option.  I can, however, get either engine outfitted with a NA air compressor.

What are the differences?  What sacrifices, if any, will I be making by going to a NA air compressor?  Is there any way to compensate for performance deficiencies of a NA air compressor (e.g. choosing a larger displacement compressor, etc...)?  

Are there any good resources, online or text, which may best explain the differences?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources