independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
(OP)
I am asked to provide input on the following project.
We have three 75HP 1800 rpm well water pumps. They pump into a common header, except that the tie-in points for the three pumps are widely separated (up to a mile apart I think).
The plant load varies widely. Up until now these machines have been fixed speed. Also the pumps are far from the operator’s stations so often the wrong number of pumps is running for the load (far to the left). We have had very low reliability. Presumably we are also wasting a lot in energy costs.
What has been proposed is to install VFD for each motor. Each motor will be controlled independently by sensing it’s discharge pressure and varying speed to match a target.
Also there is some kind of lead/lag feature where one pump would be designated to turn off during periods of extremely low load. There would be a time delay before the pump turned off and minimum off-time before it turns back on.
I am not very familiar with control schemes for this setup. I asked the question how do we control the load sharing and ensure the pumps are operating near BEP. I was told that all of the above parameters (pressure setpoints and time delays) will be adjustable. We will watch and see what it does and tweak as necessary.
The well water system is deemed relatively low priority to the plant and the project is expected low-budget and quick turnaround. We have quotes for the VFD system installed to feed existing motors at somewhere around $12,000 per pump. (Outdoor installation with cabinets).
My two questions:
1 – Is individual pressure control suitable for this type application?
2 – Is a detailed study of the system operating parameters required first, or is it ok to trust we can tweak it later.
3 – What do you think about the 3rd pump shutoff feature? I am worried that under certain conditions we are doomed to have constant cycling as soon as the time delays expire.
Thx.
We have three 75HP 1800 rpm well water pumps. They pump into a common header, except that the tie-in points for the three pumps are widely separated (up to a mile apart I think).
The plant load varies widely. Up until now these machines have been fixed speed. Also the pumps are far from the operator’s stations so often the wrong number of pumps is running for the load (far to the left). We have had very low reliability. Presumably we are also wasting a lot in energy costs.
What has been proposed is to install VFD for each motor. Each motor will be controlled independently by sensing it’s discharge pressure and varying speed to match a target.
Also there is some kind of lead/lag feature where one pump would be designated to turn off during periods of extremely low load. There would be a time delay before the pump turned off and minimum off-time before it turns back on.
I am not very familiar with control schemes for this setup. I asked the question how do we control the load sharing and ensure the pumps are operating near BEP. I was told that all of the above parameters (pressure setpoints and time delays) will be adjustable. We will watch and see what it does and tweak as necessary.
The well water system is deemed relatively low priority to the plant and the project is expected low-budget and quick turnaround. We have quotes for the VFD system installed to feed existing motors at somewhere around $12,000 per pump. (Outdoor installation with cabinets).
My two questions:
1 – Is individual pressure control suitable for this type application?
2 – Is a detailed study of the system operating parameters required first, or is it ok to trust we can tweak it later.
3 – What do you think about the 3rd pump shutoff feature? I am worried that under certain conditions we are doomed to have constant cycling as soon as the time delays expire.
Thx.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.





RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
Whether a "detailed" study is needed or not, I would ask a disinterested party (paid even) to at least illuminate the possible/expected problems so that they could be addressed before modifications.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
I suggest a cross-post into forum830 where the controls guys hang out.
My personal opinion, not having done an application quite like this:
1) Probably not the best option in an ideal world, but it may be the best you can get in the real world without serious expenditure. You can minimise the problems by using a decent industrial grade PT - e.g. a Rosemount, Foxboro, etc. Cheap sensors will doom you to a world of frequent calibrations and lousy control.
2) If you keep your loop tuning fairly placid I think you could probably tune this on the fly. Remember that a closed hydraulic system can develop large pressure swings from virtually no flow, so be wary of very low or zero flow conditions.
3) Shutting down the third pump should be fairly trivial if you have this lot under control of a DCS, and could be arranged even without one. We use a similar control system to bring in a second pump when the first one reaches 70% of capacity, and it doesn't revert to single pump operation until demand drops back to 20% or so. Figures are approximate - that job was installed quite a while ago.
That's three questions!
----------------------------------
One day my ship will come in.
But with my luck, I'll be at the airport!
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
htt
Using VFD’s and sequencing multiple pumps is a very common application but the distance is a little far. Fincor makes packaged multiple pump controls for varying demand times but I don’t know if they allow multiple pressure inputs. The distance would probably kill it though since the package would have the VFD’s in one panel.
I would put a VFD/sensor at each pump that has Ethernet(ABB, Hitachi, AB) and run it back to a switch, (N-Tron) to a local PLC and do my own program.
You should be able to find modes of operation for multiple pumps by doing a google for “pony pump” vfd control.
Barry1961
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
Will there be any communications between pump controls? You'll probably need to use a combination of pressure & total flow in order to match the number of pumps to the demand.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
----------------------------------
One day my ship will come in.
But with my luck, I'll be at the airport!
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
If you were to put a restriction on each pump's connection to the main line then control each pump with a sensor on its side of the restriction then they would be partially isolated from the vagaries of the main line and their individual VFDs would be less influenced by the others.
But this is all stuff a specialist would consider...
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
Assuming that all 3 pumps have similar pump curves and problems of stability can be overcome, the closest pump will be operating at a lower pressure, higher flow and the furthest pump will be operating at a higher pressure, lower flow. Controlled by a fixed pressure setpoint, each pump curve will cross the BEP at a different point. So trying to operate all three pumps close to the BEP will not work with simple pressure control loop.
The following will require some testing at different flow conditions with pressure measurements at all three pump locations.
I think that the most efficient method of operating the pumps is to run the closest pump as much as possible (lowest system losses, therefore cheapest operating costs). When this pump reaches maximum flow, the measured pressure becomes the start setpoint for the 2nd closest pump. The speed setpoint would be some value above the start pressure, determined by trial & error. The stop setpoint would be close to the highest pressure with the 2nd pump running are minimum speed that still produces flow.
Etc. for the 3rd pump.
Depending on the system operating condition, you may not need a VFD on the closest pump. For low flow conditions, you can experiment with other operating configurations. I realize that this will result the the closest pump operating most of the time, but assuming the well can continuously produce sufficient water and the pump will not be overloaded, I think this is your cheapest solution.
(I hope this makes sense, it's after my bedtime).
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
So, this means I'm with schell. Many VFDs can be set to just stop once they reach a certain minimum speed. So, if you tell each successive VFD down the line to operate at a slightly lower pressure you should get a successive starting operation. I'll try to give the basic example here for 2 pumps.
To begin with, you have a low flow condition so pump 1 is running at some reduced speed. It is creating X pressure in the header. Pump 2 is set to maintain Y pressure, where Y<X. At the present time, the pressure in the header is greater than the setpoint for pump 2. So, the pump 2 control loop is telling pump 2 to run at minimum speed. This means pump 2 will be stopped since the pump 2 VFD is programmed to stop the pump when a certain minimum speed is reached.
Now, the flow requirements increase. Pump 1 accelerates to full speed and reaches the point where it can no longer maintain X pressure in the header. So, the header pressure begins to drop, eventually going below Y pressure. The control loop for pump 2 will now begin to tell pump 2 to accelerate. The commanded speed for pump 2 will go above the minimum speed to stop and pump 2 will now start. Pump 2 will bring the pressure up to Y and it will be the variable speed pump controlling the pressure.
I hope this makes sense. I see a couple of issues. The first is that you may have difficulty if the flow requirements change rapidly. It would become difficult to maintain a constant pressure during pump start/stops. It would also cause the pumps to start and stop a lot, which may not be a big deal depending on the motor and pump.
The second is the difficulty when stopping a pump. You'll likely have to take the pump down below the speed where it's basically producing no flow before you shut it off. If the first pump is at full speed and the second is producing flow when it shuts off then the pressure at the second pump will drop and it will want to immediately re-start. Because of this, you may need some external controls that monitor the pump speed and not allow it to operate without any flow for more than a certain length of time before forcing it off. Or, possibly, just have some external controls with timing that holds minimum flow speed for a while before dropping it off so that the first pump has a chance to actually slow down. Then delay the second pump re-start so the first can accelerate again to make up the pressure loss. <- I hope that one makes sense
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
This naturally affects the control scheme. If the original poster would advise on this aspect of his system, we could put together a more appropriate solution.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
The demand varies within a range that sometimes requires only one pump and sometimes requires to (in their current fixed speed configuration).
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
"The demand varies within a range that sometimes requires only one pump and sometimes requires two (in their current fixed speed configuration)."
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
There are also many different program requirement for vertical hollow shaft pumps depending on if it is a oil or water lube pump.
I know that Berkley pumps has come out with an ABB drive that already has a software package in it that takes care of most of these concern. Goulds pump also has a vfd package however, I perfer the Abb due to the more options available.
I think the easy way to do this would be three drives at three different pressure points.
Good Luck
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
I would set up each pump motor with its own VFD and pressure setpoint loop (PID). Setting the lead well for the desired system pressure, the first follower pump for about 3 psi lower setpoint, and the second follower pump for about 3psi lower again.
You will go from minimum flow to maximum in about 6-7 psi.
I would not set the setpoint loops real tight. If the drive accel/decel ramps are inside the PID loop, I would set these out to around 15 seconds to avoid surging and one pump "playing" with the other two.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
Would it not be worth investigating putting a tank (header) close to where you need it and just run the pumps to top up rather than on demand?
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
I can not speak to the electrical efficiency of this design, as we have never studied it. But we have high reliability with little or no maintenance.
I do not see the need for the pump on/off feature you mentioned. This may be intended to save electricity under low load conditions, which is not a concern for our application. I would advise you to determine roughly what you are paying now for electrical power under the constant speed operation, and I am sure you can save much of that power by controlling the pressure, as once pressure is established in the piping system, it requires much less power to maintain it under low load conditions.
You are welcome to visit my site and see the system we have installed. You could then speak with our water systems operators and maintenance technician and get a feel for how satisfied we are with this system. We did ours in-house, using off-the-shelf drives and typical pressure process controllers and sensors.
- Jerry Lavoie
Automation Engineer
Nucor Steel Berkeley
lavoiej@nucorsteel.com
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
I didn't see this thread until now. What it looks to me like is the analogy that I use to non utility type folks to try to describe how a variety of power plants put power on a grid. (I usually describe a lake with contributors and users with level control being the voltage without the complications of current flow or pressure waves, of course.)
Wouldn't your control of these pumps mimic that type of control? After all, your well water header is a "grid" of sorts, and the individual contributions of each pump affect how the header acts, as does with each control valve that uses the well water.
Now, unfortunately, I still haven't met one of my life's goals which is to visit the brain center of my local utility to see how they dispatch units.
But, based on activities that I have had over the years with power plants, I do know that the dispatchers know exactly what each unit is doing and what that is doing to the grid. Me and a plant operator got our hands slapped pretty good once when he delayed getting to where they told him to be while I completed getting some test data.
I see your situation as analogous, for whatever this comment is worth. Maybe someone who has a feel for that type of control could help.
Your problem is real, and your question is a good one.
rmw
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
- yes, individual pressure controls may be suitable, but when you start, you'll be best to only vary your speed (continuously) to pressure on your primary pump. -- Using a single pressure sensor, and controller input, will simplify your system and improve reliability, and that's how I'd approach it.
- yes, the 3rd pump on and off delay will help, and if you're using a PLC (and IT's) analog P / PI / PID control, you'll easily be able to rotate your primary, secondary, intermittant pump order to suit your pumps to equalize the load share (and pump/motor/drive wear), or accomodate PM or breakdown occurrances, or even to reduce demand on a certain aquifer.
I've basically dealt with very similar setups on hydraulic pumping systems and large multi compressor air systems. I'm no wellguy though if your wells themselves are inconsistant.
- Whose VFDs to use is perhaps a question of politics. Whichever local vendor gives you the best service and support is often the best choice. I've had the situation where the supplier that gave the best service by far, was the supplier that had the "second class" product lines available, and that's why they knocked themselves out to be everybody's best buddy. Allen Bradley used to have very stuck-up distributors to match their own corporate attitude, and I used to do mostly Square D. That was some time ago though. AB has come a long way in recent years toward better customer service, but are still overpriced for a lot of stuff. All that said, they do make great drives, and to me that means durability AND features, AND availability.
remember: An opinion is only as good as the one who gives it!
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
Lots of good data here!!
There is no doubt that the preferable way, is to use common control for all the pumps. Many of the drives available today have multi pump controls to ensure that all pumps operate forthe same period of time etc. If you want to operate these pumps totally independantly, this is commonly done in water reticulations systems, there should be no problems provided that the pumps are sufficiently separated. The piping provides a hydraulic impedance that gives sufficient isolation to prevent instability.
If the pumps are close enough to interact togather hydraulically, I would use slightly different set points, and different integration factors in the PID control. This will tend to create a natural master slave situation with no electrical interconnection.
Most drives also include a sleep function. If you use a pressure wakeup rather than the usual PID wakeup, you will have less problems with drives starting and stopping all the time. This will also help to improve the stability of the system.
Best regards,
Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com
RE: independent vfd of 3 pumps feeding system at separate locations
One pump is always frequency controlled, and the rest can be single or variable speed, the VFC is controlled by a pressure gauge keeping the pressure constant.
In simple setups the main pump, frequency controlled, is trying to keep the pressure constant, by some 110% speed it is slowed down, and one single speed pump is started, ans the speed of the first pump is adjusted to keep the pressure. The single speed pumps should have soft-start, but I have not seen problems by direct or Y/D start.
Up to 4 single speed pumps can run on the system, controlled by relay outputs from the VFC.
Systems with up to 5 frequency controlled pumps can also be powered by Danfoss VFC.
The starting sequence of the "slave" pumps can alternate to ensure use of all wells and to spread the wear of the pumps.
http://www.us.water.danfoss.com/products/cascade/
Bruchure
http://
Aksel