×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

(OP)
All,

How are most of you designing a roof diaphragm that spans across multiple supports (interior shear walls)?  Should I look at each span as simply supported or as a continuous beam?  If I analyze as a continuous beam is my chord force (M/B) calculated using the positive and/or negative moment?  

Thanks

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

Simple spans.

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

For considerably large flexible diaphragms (metal deck without concrete or wood panel), I treat them as simple spans.

For wood framed structures, typically single family homes, shear walls are relatively close together (i.e. short diaphragm spans).  In this case, an envelope solution from both the flexible and rigid diaphragm distribution is used.  A good panel discussion on this topic can be found from this link: http://www.seaint.org/wood.htm

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

(OP)
Thank you all for a consensus answer, but if a diaphragm is a deep beam with tension & compression chords why would you not assume that there would be some continuity across the support?  I guess for simplicity and conservatism we use simply supported.  A two span condition (equal span) would yield wl^2/8 for negative moment but the positive moment is reduced and would yield a lesser chord force at the max positive moment location vs. the max negative location.  If you have reentrant corners or drag struts this complicates your design because the max moment doesn't always fall at the end of your collector.  

I’m currently looking at a one story building, irregular shaped with offset shear walls, reentrant corners and multiple drag strips...a little more complicated than your average box.  I certainly want to simplify my analysis but don’t know if oversimplification is going to work here.

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

To me, the term "diaphram" implies something thin, not a "deep beam".

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

For flexible diaphragms use simple beams. For Rigid, distribute based on the rigidities of he supports.

Regards,
Lutfi

RE: Flexible Roof Diaphragm Over Multiple Supports

The IBC Code does recognize that a wood diaphragm can act as a rigid diaphragm--it allows three sided diaphragms.  I am more liberal on this than others, but if you need to assume the diaphragm is rigid to make it work, I say go for it.  The only caution I would issue is that a very long, shallow diaphragm would probably not be rigid.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources