×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

storage-discharge relationship

storage-discharge relationship

storage-discharge relationship

(OP)
I am using HEC HMS to do river reach routing.  I have an existing bridge and several proposed models as well.  I am trying to compare the existing outflow at 100 year storm (and others) to the proposed outflow at the 100 year storm.  I am using Modified Puls routing.  I am trying to find out if I can use the rating curve points from HEC RAS as my elevation-flow values to use in the HEC HMS model?  If so, from which cross section do I use the rating curve?  Upstream of the bridge?, just inside the upstream face?, just inside the downstream face?  

RE: storage-discharge relationship

It was my experience that HEC-RAS is much more conservative performing storage-discharge calculations than was software designed for the purpose (specifically, Hydraflow Hydrographs 2002).  

Our justification for using Hydraflow's output in preference to HEC-RAS's for culverts with pressure flow was that HEC-RAS's 1-dimensional calculations were not as accurate in this particular instance as the 3-dimensional volume calculation used by Hydraflow.

Essentially, we modeled small culverts under pressure as normal detention basins, while we retained HEC-RAS's output for bridges with large flows.  I should point out, however, that we were designing the culverts and did not want to have any weir flow as the culvert was under a road.   When we modeled a bridge, however, we stuck with HEC-RAS as the component of pressure flow was minimal compared to the flow overtopping the abuttments.  Also, HEC-RAS's input for bridges is more detailed than that for culverts.

RE: storage-discharge relationship

(OP)
Thanks, but that doesn't really answer my question.  Maybe I didn't word it well.  I have a bridge model in HEC RAS.  I have several different profiles in my steady flow file.  After I run the computations, I end up with a rating curve that shows a relationship between elevation and flow at different stations in my channel.  Now--think of HEC HMS or even HEC1.  I need a stage-volume-elevation relationship to do routing.  I have my stage-volume relationship from the terrain model and the spreadsheet calculations for accumulated storage.  What I am asking is:  Is the rating curve I received in HEC RAS an accurate relationship between flow and elevation so that I could take points from that curve and use them as input in my HEC HMS routing model?  And if so, at which station's rating curve do I take the points?  If not, what's the best way to find that relationship?

RE: storage-discharge relationship

yes - if your HECRAS model is done accurately...

it would be hard to find another analytical method that can beat HECRAS for bridge hydraulics.

RE: storage-discharge relationship

I've seen the approach you say used to develop a Stage-Volume-Discharge table (F-table) for HSPF modeling.  I think accuracy is going to be more tied to the spacing & number of HEC-RAS x-sects than the actual error in the numerical modeling method, so long as you are using subcritical flow when appropriate in the HEC-RAS.

IMO this is a good approach to use when measured flows are not available to correlate stage to discharge, especially if the HEC-RAS is set up carefully.  If measured flows are available, be sure to use them to validate the HEC-RAS or to directly develop the relationship in HEC-HMS.

RE: storage-discharge relationship

(OP)
So, I could use this relationship instead of using Manning's equation for open channel flow, the orifice equation, and the weir equation?  I hope so, because for a natural channel bottom, those equations get real messy in terms of wetted perimeter and area.  It would be way too time consuming to establish a elevation-flow relationship that way.

No one ever said if it mattered about which station's rating curve I should use.  At and around the bridge station, the curve is a little different.  Which station would accurately represent the relationship I need for routing in HEC HMS?

RE: storage-discharge relationship

I would recommend HECRAS over your manual method which probably does not account for backwater, contraction or expansion losses, overbank flow or variable n-values

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources