×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

pencil & paper vs. software for calcs
2

pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

(OP)
I'm wondering, how many structural engineers mainly rely on software like mathcad for their calcs, versus how many mainly rely on a calculator with pencil and paper?

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I use software for preliminary sizing and verifying final design. I use pencil and paper for design, regardless of project size.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

bjb,

An interesting question.  I brought up a similar topic in thread507-126479

I do most of my calcs with software now.  Some of the reason for this is that I work on standard products where my work is routine enough that I can automate some of it.  I do hand calcs for something unusual or out of the ordinary.  Also do some hand calcs when doing a quick check of my output or when taking data from one program to another.

I mostly use CalculationCenter which is a lite version of Mathematica.  It's a handy program that certainly is capable of just about anything a structural engineer will need.  A disadvantage is that it's output is relatively unattractive especially when compared to Mathcad.  I currently use it for ASD code checking of FEA output.

Regards,
-Mike



RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Overall, we use software for about 75% of the calcs. Personally, I use software probably at least 95% of the time, especially Excel. ( I am an "old" guy but am kind of burned out by punching calculator and writing numbers all day). We don't use Mathcad at all.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

(OP)
Most of my calc's are still by hand.  We do alot of alterations to existing structures and additions, and run into stuff that can be unusual.  I have some spreadsheets that I made for things like shearwall analysis for rigid and flexible diaphragms, and I also have some things programmed into my HP, like alowable stress for wood columns and unbraced wood beams. I have checked out enercalc, but so far the powers that be are not into it.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I had considered buying Mathcad several times over the years, but each time I got interested it had drastically increased in price (currently it is $1200).  Finally I bought CalculationCenter because it was relatively inexpensive at $295.  It to has gone up in price however, currently at $595.  I like it but it's not pretty.  Mathcad seems to be the standard for engineering.

-Mike

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I am still patiently waiting for the day when I can have all computer generated calcs on a project (I will probably be retired before that day comes). We have over 100+ spreadsheets that we use for specific tasks in addition to RAM, Visual Analysis, Enercalc, etc. No Mathcad.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

(OP)
Jike, how do you like Enercalc?

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Unlike large steel or concrete buildings, wood-framed buildings are very tedious to calculate without software, and Enercalc doesn't really provide a total system approach. (Woodworks is somwhat better in that regard). Therefore we have developed an Excel workbook that greatly automates the procedure for wood-framed buildings, especially multi-family residential.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I use both pencil & paper and Enercalc for component design.  Primarily, I use Enercalc for steel and concrete member design, retaining wall design and spread footing design.  I don't like to use the masonry design modules in Enercalc, but my business partner uses those modules.  Use some of the Enercalc analysis modules occasionally.  I use pencil and paper for masonry, wood, most cold-formed framing and shear wall design.  I use LGBeamer for some cold-formed metal framing design.  I use STAAD for frame analysis.  I use D-Coder for wind load calculations.  we have a copy of Woodworks that has wood framing and shear wall design that my partner says works well, but I have not used it.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I use paper and pencil for most situations. Sometimes compose Excel spreadsheets to do repetitive operations. Use basic software for steel or wood beam continuous span calcs for shear, moment, & deflection. However, I no longer do very many design projects, and they are normally one-of-a-kind.

www.SlideRuleEra.net

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I use pencil and paper for graphically presenting my thought process that may be lost few years down the road unless it is on paper.  Typically include sketches, load directions on a connection, etc.

In lieu of using a calculator, I find it easier to make a mini-spreadsheet tool for complex formulas and many variables.  If it is worth saving, I save it first and develop it over time into my official spreadsheet.

There are many software available to perform a particular task, but there are limitations on how the results are presented.  I always add a written design criteria before any series of computer printouts stating the purpose and conclusions from the analysis.

MathCad and Excel spreadsheets developed for specific calculation task definitely reduce design time, but I always make my engineers perform a hand calc version at least ONCE before "trusting" and reusing the spreadsheet/MathCAD sheet.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Even though I wasn't asked, I'll give you my opinion of Enercalc:
It seems as if it was developed by software people with only a passing familiarity of design.  For instance, for concrete beam design, it asks you for the distance from the top of beam to the center line of the reinforcing.  There's no reason that with the bar size and the cover that this couldn't be calculated.  I've programmed it into my HP.  This seems like a minor quibble until you've had to do it a couple of hundred times.
Or take the case of updates.  Their website looks like it hasn't been updated in years. They've been promising a version 6.0 for about two years now.   This doesn't give me a lot of confidence in their business.  
They seem to be the only game in town regarding individual element design and they act like it.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I find the original question perplexing.  In my experience, Mathcad is an elegant spreadsheet environment that merely performs the arithmetic for you.  Since the user is entering all the equations, I don’t consider this a situation where the software is doing all the design.  As you may have guessed, I am very pleased with Mathcad and use it often.  My only regret is that it does not easily permit me to place diagrams into the spreadsheets.  I know that I can scan a sketch into the computer and then place it into the file, but that is rather time consuming and does not lend itself to easy modification.

I do fear engineers that rely on software too heavily.  A recent experience I had when I was asked to review another engineer’s work for my client is a good example.  He had a major software vendor’s product that promised to design a cantilever retaining wall.  There was a bug in the program, and the solution to the 20+ ft high retaining wall adjacent to a RR track was to supply minimum steel (in this case #7 @ 12 inches) rather than #9 @ 6”, which he detailed after I brought the problem to his attention.  In my opinion, he should have taken out a pencil and checked it himself when he saw it on the drawing because #7 @ 12” just looks too light.  But either because he was in a terrible hurry, was out of budget or possibly because he didn’t know any better, he did not do this.  Fortunately, I caught the mistake, but his client suffered some delay and don’t know that he will work for that client again.

Good question, but I don’t think Mathcad, Excel or any other spreadsheet is the real problem.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

(OP)
Jed, I have the equation for the direct calculation for area of steel from the CRSI entered into my HP.  It's a great time saver.  In my calcs, I do the calculation for Moment strength to back it up, and also so it doen't seem like I pulled As out of the air (or some other place).

Thanks to all for the replies.  Personally, I think that a combination of hand calcs and software is right for me.  I think that I am biased more towards the hand calc end of the spectrum though.  If I had more projects that involved cranking out lots of memebers, I would adjust for that and use more software.  I only trust the software or my use of it if I can also do it by hand.  For documentation purposes in my calcs, I include all relevant design criteria, assumptions, and descriptions of what I'm trying to do so that if I have to go back to these calcs later, it will hopefully make sense.  

One thing that scares me though, is people who use all this software without a good grasp of the priciples, who actually are more like computer operators than engineers.  I think that at some point in the future there will be a significant collapse that will be traced back to that kind of person using software with the garbage-in garbage-out syndrome in play.  This last comment is not intended to be an attack on qualified engineers who choose to use software for most or all of their calcs.  I have no problem with that at all.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Jed, according to the Enercalc website, Enercalc was developed and is maintained by a structural engineer.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

bjb:

I use Enercalc for steel beams with partial drifted loads, steel cols with uniaxial or biaxial bending, base plates, combined footing, etc. I haven't been totally pleased with their service or frequency of their updates but I continue to use it until a better option comes along. I like the ability to store all the calcs in one project file.

I have thought about replacing these with Excel spreadsheets when I get some more time.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I have two engineer interns who rely too much on software only.  they are frustrated with me demanding they check things by hand, not to trust the software answers.  one told me, "but the computer is always correct."  my response, "how do you know?", didn't please him and I asked for hand calcs to prove his assumption the computer is always correct.  He made some input errors and had an incorrect solution using the software.  His hand calcs showed the correct solution.  the same intern developed some a spreadsheet for steel beam design that turned out to be incorrect, also, because he didn't use hand calcs to verify his Excel equations.  Seems like the young folks think that because they get an answer, not an error, when using software, the answer must be correct.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

For designing simply supported steel beams or girders, I request my engineers to supply hand drawn load diagrams which shows the breakdown of dead/live loads, derivation of loads such as tributary area/width and surface load, identify the NAME of any unusual point load, etc.  Only then I allow them to use a software such as RAMSBeam, Enercalc and so on.

No software I am aware of provide a comprehensive breakdown and identification of loads that can be understood with ease after six months (or by someone other than the one who performed the computer design).

Computer is available now as a tool for obtaining quick solutions but it is not yet read for prime time to fully replace hand calcs for many applications.

"Computer is always correct" argument is a scary one and all too ubiquitous among the new generation of engineers.  It is imperative that the experienced engineers train and guide the young engineers to avoid catastrophe.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Dinosaur

I use Microsoft Visio for putting sketches into Mathcad.  Visio is a business sketching package.  It is quite intuitive and all you do is copy and paste to get them into mathcad.  It wont do drawings as accurately as a bona fide draughting package, but if its just a sketch representation I think its pretty good.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

IMO, Enercalc was really a revoultionary and ingenious product when it first came out. Over the years, it has improved only slightly in technical quality. (Discounting the inevitable evolution from Lotus123-based to DOS to Windows version)

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Years ago when I got my first FEA program I remember reading in the manual something to the effect that "the fact that a computer program runs through to completion does not necessarily mean the output is correct."  This is still good advice today in my opinion.

-Mike

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Just an observation here.  I find it interesting that those projects that are of immense complexity, such as huge multistory buildings, can't be done by hand.  They would take too much time and hand calculations would introduce too many chances for error.  The projects that need accuracy the most are the ones that depend on computers the most.  And the future of structural engineering doesn't look like it's going to get any simpler (just look at the wind load requirements in ASCE 7-02!).

So, if it's good for goose, it's good for the gander?  Why accept the computer stuff on the big projects without question but question the stuff on the little projects?  Seems contradictory to me.

I personally do both - hand and computer (including purchased software and spreadsheets that I have developed in Excel).  I would use more computer programs if I could afford them!

I remember when we were first allowed to use calculators in high school.  My father would not let me use my calculator at home without doing the problems by hand first.  Today, calculators (and I'm talking fancy graphing things) are required by high schools, even down to a particular model and manufacturer.

This debate almost sounds like a cultural thing.  The old guys (like me) grew up with slide rules and calculators that might do square root.  Kids today are growing up with technology that boggles the mind.  They have implicit trust in this stuff to the point that questioning it's usefulness is like questioning the value of a car (duh!).

We need to accept that fact that technology is here to stay.  As a community, we should be developing training methodologies for new engineers that utilize these tools effectively instead of forcing hand calcs as a check against the "machine".  At the same time, we need to lobby the software companies to develop programs that we can use instead of what makes them money.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I agree that computers are necessary.  they are a wonderful "tool", not a substitution for "brain".  in my opinion, computers and associated software are sophisticated calculators.  they are no "smarter" than my pencil.  that's what I'm trying to make my engineer interns understand.  

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

I do 90% of my calculations by hand, and my boss keeps wanting me to use EnerCalc.  Each beam he uses another sheet in EnerCalc and his calcs are twice as fat as mine.  He says the fatter the packet the easier it is for the client to write the check.  I think a client won't compalain about the hours when they see the calcs were done by hand.  
We do all wood construction, vertical and lateral.  So the calc's are easy.  For steel beams I'll use enercalc because of the database, otherwise, I use my trusty TI-83 with self-written programs for beams.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

We stress to all our engineering interns that software is a tool that can be used facilitate structural design.  However, we require hand calcs in tne early months of employment so that I can see that they understand what thier diong.  Recently, I reviewed some Enercalc output by one of the engineers and noticed he forgot to change the load duration back to 1.0 when designing floor beams.  These things can easily be overlooked by young engineers.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

Older engineers have developed an intuition for sizing through their experience and having solved problems by hand when they were young engineers.  Without having developed a "sense" for what sizes appear adequate as opposed to obnoxiously over/undersized, it is dangerous for young engineers to trust a computer output without a senior engineers review/comment.

I am not against technology, in fact, I am completely in favor of using computer as a tool (as much as we can to minimize design time so we have more money left over after putting food on the table).  What I object to is blind trust in computer output.

Project managers, and senior engineers alike, are often pressured with meeting deadlines.  They don't have time to look over every input/output that design engineers produce.  Only with proper training, one can gain confidence in young engineers' work and ensure their career development.

At this stage in the structural engineering field, a good balance of hand calcs and "readable" computer output are essential for our own sake as well as the public we serve.

RE: pencil & paper vs. software for calcs

SlideRuleEra,

That brings back memories.  I had a post Versalog that I think cost about $30 which was a lot of money for a college student back then.  Thankfully we don't have to use these anymore.  I'm glad you posted that however.  The next time I'm grinding through some code to get a program to work it might help to think back to my sliderule days.

Thanks,
-Mike

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources