×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

elements through the thickness

elements through the thickness

elements through the thickness

(OP)
Hi,

is ansys help file to shell 181 is written :

....a number of elements through the thickness direction is necessary....what does this mean ? - when using shell elements i can only attach one element to one surface and via real constant attach its thickness, of course i can attach a number of layers to this thickness...but probably
expression element is not the same as layer...

so how to do this "element through the thickness" in accordance with shell elements ?

thanx

RE: elements through the thickness

Hi,
I think the sentence is refered to when you use shell section definition instead of real constant. Above in the same chapter of SHELL181 element description, it is said that using real constants for shell181 is not precluded, but that using shell section is more "general" and alows more control and options.

Regards

RE: elements through the thickness

(OP)
thanx for your effort cbrn, but i probably didnt explain my problem correctly, i will try again :

i want to try use reduced integration of shell181 and this use is connected with requirement "...a number of elements through the thickness direction is necessary"

so my question is : which way to do this ? because if i did this "a number of elements through the thickness" literally (lets say for 4 elements through the thickness of shell ), i would create 4 surfaces and attach 1/4 thickness to each surface, but furthermore i would tie  the nodes of this surfaceces together, because otherwise these 4 surface will not act as one entity...

so i think there must be another better way to do this...

RE: elements through the thickness

Hi SKJoe,

You should look at the Figure 4.181-2 on the description page of the Shell181 element. The "thickness direction" is not the thicknes of the shell element! It is the thicknes in the load direction. Read carefully the description of this element. It says, if your shell elements have in plane bending and if you are using the reduced integration, then you should have more then 4 elements  through the "thickness direction" not "through the thickness of shell" as you interpreted.

Do your elements have in plane bending? Then use more than 4 elements in the direction of bending.

Regards
Alex

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources