Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
(OP)
I'm working on a job here and for the foundation of our basin we have specified "95% compacted No. 2 Crusher Run"
The customers QC department has come back and want some kind of spec. or ASTM # that actually specifies WHAT No. 2 Crusher Run is...what standards it has to meet to actually be No. 2 crusher run.
Does anyone know of a standard or spec. that would define what they want to know?
Thanks a lot
Ken
The customers QC department has come back and want some kind of spec. or ASTM # that actually specifies WHAT No. 2 Crusher Run is...what standards it has to meet to actually be No. 2 crusher run.
Does anyone know of a standard or spec. that would define what they want to know?
Thanks a lot
Ken






RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
regarding your compaction, do you define what you mean when you say 95% compacted....? You can compact according to the modified proctor test or the standard proctor test, but they are not the same thing.
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
DaveAtkins
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
Recommending compaction effort and fill material is the specialty of geotechnical engineers, but structural engineers usually have a working knowledge of it too. Is there a geotechnical engineer that is involved with your project? I didn't think that aerospace engineers normally get involved with things like crusher rune stone.
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
Thanks again
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"
RE: Is there a Standard for "No. 2 Crusher Run"