×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mating Parts in Assemblies

Mating Parts in Assemblies

Mating Parts in Assemblies

(OP)
Just how important are mates in an assembly, i ask this question because more often than not i end up using then deleting mates during the assembly stage to get the assembly together. Should i perservere and use the correct mates to join components or does it not matter as long as the parts go together.

RE: Mating Parts in Assemblies

Uh.... you delete all of your mates?  How do your assy's stay together?

You do know that if you try to drag your parts, they WILL move if they are not constrained, right?

In short, mates are VERY important!

RE: Mating Parts in Assemblies

Mates are very important, and are a key to a fully parametric (associated) assembly.

Without Mates, if you were to move a hole in one part, there would be no telling how a mating part would be affected by that change.

Without Mates, if you changed teh size (width, length) of a part, there would be no telling how surrounding parts would be affected by that change.

Some common mistakes I see with some new users is they think Mates are only good for the "design" stage of a project.  These types of people often replace Mates with "fixed" parts.  This causes a lot of trouble and problems later down the road.  I always train people (at work) to never Fix anything.

When Mating, you do not need to go overboard, meaning you don't always have to keep adding Mates until your parts are fully constrained.  An exampleof allowing unconstrained parts in an assembly would be a srew in a hole.  You'd want to use a Concentric Mate to place it in the hole and perhaps a Coincident Mate to define the depth of install in the hole.  Do you really need to add a 3rd Mate to stop it from rotating in the hole?  Probably not.

Another key tips are to always Mate Planes together if possible.  This will ensure a more robust final assembly model.

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943.
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?

RE: Mating Parts in Assemblies

(OP)
I have fallen into the 'Fix part' trap (thanks MadMango), once my parts are together in an assebley, my parts stay together that way, my assemblies arnt very compicated therefore i havnt come across any problems, but i see your point (MMike1), i will concentrate more on getting the mates right in the first place.

Thanks

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources