×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CU Triaxial Test Parameters

CU Triaxial Test Parameters

CU Triaxial Test Parameters

(OP)
I recently had a CU triaxial series run on a sample of lean clay with pore pressure monitoring and back pressure saturation.  When I look at the results, they varied significantly depending on how the results were presented.  Three tests were run for the series, at confining pressures  of 1/2, 1 and 2 tsf.  When the failure criterion was "maximum stress ratio", the effective friction angle was 32.6 degrees.  When maximum pore pressure" was used, it was 31.1 degrees.  When "percent axial strain" was used, it was 31.8 degrees, but when "maximum deviator stress" was used it was only 18.9 degrees.  Now I'm not sure which values would be appropriate for the effective stress analysis.  Also, what could cause such a variation?  Thanks

RE: CU Triaxial Test Parameters

It looks to me the close 3 first answers you refer to would represent values close to the average inner friction angle by 3 estimates, whilst the 4th one would represent one -in a from test evaluation- that most differs from that gained from the average of the tests.

If you want, the first 3 ones would be close to average and good for probabilistic prediction of the behaviour, and the last one would be close to the safe engineering value of the inner friction angle, in this case that ascertained for this case to be 100% -or always- warranted, from your tests.

Normally, a safe engineering value of a parameter needs not to be ensured but 95% of the times.

Of course, 3 or 4 tests stay statiscally non-significant and only from more tests you can guess which value of the inner friction angle can be ensured to be got at least 95% of the times.

Respect use, you would use the average value anywhere the true behaviour expected is to be modeled, and the safe engineering value for life safety standard calculations, i.e., you would use the safe engineering value for strength design of structures.

RE: CU Triaxial Test Parameters

when determining failure I like to uses 2% strain
and get the axial and confining stress on the soil

you can also get a peak strenght if you plot the stress strain curve and pull your values at the peak

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources