Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
Join Eng-Tips Forums

Member Login

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

SlideRuleEra (Structural) (OP)
10 Oct 05 11:41
Have been looking high & low for the maximum reinforcement allowed per ACI 318-02 (need to use that particular revision for this project). All that I can find is the minimum (paragraph 10.5).
Advice appreciated.

Helpful Member!  JAE (Structural)
10 Oct 05 12:17
Looks like they revised section 10.3.3 - removed the 75% x rho(balanced) limit and now use a strain limit in the steel.

Read 10.3.3 through 10.3.5.  Specifically 10.3.5 is the new limiting provision.
Helpful Member!  UcfSE (Structural)
10 Oct 05 12:41
Just to add some to what JAE wrote, you have a minimum steel strain et of 0.004 in stead of the maximum reinforcement ratio.  In order to use the phi factor for flexure of 0.9, you have to have a minimum et of 0.005.  With f'c = 4ksi and fy = 60 ksi and using et_max = 0.004, you get a maximum reinforcement ratio of around 0.72*rho_balanced.  The new limit is similar to the old 0.75*rho_balanced and is slightly more conservative, for these numbers anyway.
JAE (Structural)
10 Oct 05 12:46
I just did a few rough calcs and got the following:

ρ(maximum) = (0.3643(f'c)(β1)) / fy

This is for a rectangular, singly reinforced beam.  Someone want to check me on this?
Helpful Member!  WillisV (Structural)
10 Oct 05 12:46
JAE is correct, this method was moved from the appendix to the main body in '-2.  As noted in the commentary of 10.3.5 0.75rho balance was approximately a strain limit of 0.00376 as opposed to the 0.004 in the new code.   

UcfSE (Structural)
10 Oct 05 12:51
I have the same 0.3643 factor.
SlideRuleEra (Structural) (OP)
10 Oct 05 13:16
Thanks to each of you on your timely advice.

miecz (Structural)
11 Oct 05 15:02
Looking at PCA notes on 318-02 (page 6-17), it seems that the factor is 0.85*ec/(ec+es), where ec=.003 and es=.005.  The factor is then 0.319.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Back To Forum

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close