×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Column Lap Splice Seismic Requirements

Column Lap Splice Seismic Requirements

Column Lap Splice Seismic Requirements

(OP)
When detailing columns as "members not designated as part of the lateral-force-resisting system" per ACI 318-02 (or -05) Section 21.11, the two possibilities are: (1) the forces under the design displacements are less than the member strengths, and (2) the forces under design displacements exceed the member strengths, or are not checked.  The first category is covered in Section 21.11.2, and the second in 21.11.3.

Section 21.11.2.2 requires members to conform to Section 21.4.3, which in turn requires lap splices in the middle half of the column clear height (21.4.3.2).  However, Section 21.11.3 does NOT appear to require following 21.4.3.2, which would mean that lap splices would NOT be required to be in the middle half of the clear height.  Generally, the requirements of 21.11.3 are more restrictive, since it allows the designer to not check the columns under the design displacements.  For lap splices, though, it appears to be less restrictive.

Is this a correct interpretation of the code?  Are lap splice requirements loosened because of the increased tie requirements?  Or is the intent of the code to require mid-height splices for all columns in high seismic zones?

Adding to the confusion, the 2003 IBC in Section 1908.1.6 adds the following revision to ACI 21.11.2.2: "Lap splices of longitudinal reinforcement in such members need not satisfy Section 21.4.3.2 in structures where the seismic-force-resisting system does not include special moment frames."  This would reduce the above difficulties to only those buildings in high seismic zones with special moment frames, and only when looking at columns not part of the moment frames.  However, the inconsistency would still seem to be present in this case, where the designer could skip the design displacement check and get around the mid-height splice requirement.

Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this issue.

RE: Column Lap Splice Seismic Requirements

I believe you are correct in that there is an inconsistency in the two methods.  It appears that this issue was brought up during the public review period for ACI 318-05, however it was not resolved.  The committee said it will consider revising the section for the 2008 version.

I find it interesting that the IBC 2000 modified ACI 318-99 so that mid-height lap splices were not required, and IBC 2003 changed the modification to exclude mid-height lap splices in structures that do not include special moment frames.  One would think that considering the amount of attention that this section of the code has seen lately, the discrepancy that you pointed out would have been noticed and changed by now.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources