×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Clarification of elastomeric bearing

Clarification of elastomeric bearing

Clarification of elastomeric bearing

(OP)
I'm new here and have read thru the posts on elastomeric bearing pads. What methods are used to fasten the bearing pad to a concrete bridge seat? Also, would it be appropriate to partially restrain the sides of the elastomeric pad to influence the shape factor S ?

RE: Clarification of elastomeric bearing

An adhesion product appropriate for bonding to concrete is all that is specified in some cases.  This is the case for abutments and piers where the ends of the girders are cast in concrete diaphragms.  In open applications, the elastormeric pad is bonded with the same product but the overall bearing assembly is prohibited from moving in certain directions by use of sole plates and anchor bolts.

As for enhancing the shape factor, some bearing configuations probably do take this into account.  For example on multi-rotational bearings where the upper assembly sits in a lower assembly on a elastomer unit the unit is usually contained within some type of ring that prevents translation of the upper assembly and confines the lower elastomer unit as well.

RE: Clarification of elastomeric bearing

It is broadly recommended that you do not attempt to bond bearing pads in place.
The technique can be difficult due to the use of anti ozonants in the rubberr compound, and if the ' adhesive ' fails, the co-efficient of friction reduces and thus the bearing can more easily slip out.
If you restrain by confining part of the rubber thickness, then the permitted shear deformation is reduced.
An exact answer would be governed by the overall thickness of the ' bearing ' pad you nominate.
So far as the other answer is concerned, a POT BEARING requires totally different ' restraiint ' compared to a bearing pad.

RE: Clarification of elastomeric bearing

The shape factor is best effected by adding or removing shims. In this way you can better modify stiffness. External restraint to limit bulge is not the best approach. I would expect cutting action on the rubber surface which would probably be detrimental to bearing operation and life.

RE: Clarification of elastomeric bearing

In Virginia, the DOT construction specifications require a gritty material to be bonded to the mating surfaces to increase the friction force between the pad and the structure.  I would expect this technique to be used in other states as well.

I would be surprised if the coefficient of friction between a pad and a mating surface of concrete or steel were less than 0.5.  I would expect it to be close to 1 when the grit is applied.

Incidently, check your anchor bolts carefully when you use elastomeric bearings.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources