×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SOL 106- not converging

SOL 106- not converging

SOL 106- not converging

(OP)
There was a previous thread similar to this which I read, but in didnt prove helpful. So here I go posting this thread, hopeful that someone has run into a similar situation.

I am running SOL 106 for a beam-column type of analysis, nonlinearity for the displacements. The constraint is simply supported on one end, and roller on the other end, free to translate along the column's own axis. The actual loading case is an axial compressive load and distributed load along the column, which yielded a non convergent solution. The column is modeled by shells, and is loaded eccentrically by the compressive load.

Now, I did do a few tests by I varying the magnitude of the loads, and running only compressive and only distributed load. What i found is that I can find a convergent solution if i decrease the load enough. So there is a specific magnitude for which any runs with loads higher than that wont converge. If the model runs just fine with smaller loads, does that mean its an actual physical instability of the structure? which would mean that I need to re-design my part? Or is it only an algorithm occurence? Im leaning towards the first possibility. Please give me any kind of input- it will be appreciated. Thank you.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

In sol 106 ,make sure you dont have any rbe2 or bar elements as they are linear elements.

The other thing to try out is to make more than one load cases and increase the number of increments on NLPARM card until you see any convergence. Note that convergence level ,and add another loadcase and rerun with higher number of increments. Try this several time , and you will see it converging unless you have very flexible part or mechanism.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

(OP)
I dont have any rbe2 or bars. I tried increasing the NLPARM card several times, but my model still seems to converge at about 90% of load, and then diverges. Maybe my part is too flexible like you mentioned, which means i should stiffen it.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

No convergence can also mean some kind of structural collaps. Do you have anything like yield limits in the model?

RE: SOL 106- not converging

It looks like your beam is buckled under compressive. If it is true, just find the load step that your solution begins to diverge. That is the buckling load.

Usually, it need a small structural imperfection to have buckling. But sometimes, numerical roundoff can also introduce buckling.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

(OP)
Thanks for all the great comments. In response to the last posts:

ThomasH,
I dont have any yield limits in the model. I have linear isotropic & orthrotropic materials in the model, so it shouldnt recognize yields.

EricZhao,
Ive already thought about that. I did a test where i imposed 2 of the same load cases, with different magnitudes, but I know both exceed the number that allows convergence. Both did not converge, and diverged at a percentage of the full load. One was at about 82% load, the other at 90% load. When i calculated the failure loads for these 2 cases, they werent the same magnitude. So it doesnt consistently give me the same buckling load. But, I still tend to believe that this might be hinting a physical geometric instability that actually exists. But i dont know this for sure.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

I would suggest that you do simple eigen buckling analysis. Usually, the result from eigen buckling is larger than the actual buckling limit. So, if your currnet load is larger than the eigen buckling limit, you are in trouble already.

RE: SOL 106- not converging

To continue on Eric's thought and to confirm it run your Sol 106 analysis at 50% load. If it converges you probably have collapse. If it will not converge you probably have other issues.

Another thought. If the compressive load causes the beam to arch up into the distributed  load then is it possible you  are seeing some kind of snap through?

RE: SOL 106- not converging

(OP)
The buckling analysis was a good idea. However, I ran that, and found my current load is NOT bigger than the eigen buckling limit. I was hoping that would be the case.

I did do runs with less load and found that my solution converges. kellnerp, what do you mean by "collapse."? Is that something that would happen physically, or something in the algorithm?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources