×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seawater application
6

Seawater application

Seawater application

(OP)
Hi,

One of our contractors stated that for a Fire Water (seawater) system Stainless Steel may be specified (316L).
So far, I have never seen Fire Water systems specified in Stainless Steel.
Although the system temperature will not be that high (aprrox. 30 degr.C max), we believe that st.st. is not suitable. The system is filled but normally no flow.

Thanks in advance for any reply.

Regards.

RE: Seawater application

I don't know your jurisdiction, but I know plastic piping for fire protection wasn't allowed at our site (US) and was told sevral times that it was not permitted by both insurance and government regulations.   

When I left they were trying to get a ruling on using a Polyliner to rehabilitate some cement lined DI pipe.  

RE: Seawater application

I don't know about the anodes. Inside the pipe? I suspect the corrosion products would plug the sprinkler heads just when they are needed. Why not recirculate the sea water to keep it oxygenated? I understand that oxygen depleted water will corrode the SS.

RE: Seawater application

No, don't use SS for seawater piping.  A Cu alloy is the standard choice.  You could do it is brass, but a bronze (NAB) would be better.  Aren't Naval systems mostly in Cu/Ni?

Stagnant seawater water isn't good on low alloy SS.  The O2 depletion and sediemnt combine to kill you.  There are stainless grades that would work (AL-6XN), but at a price.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion, every where, all the time.
Manage it or it will manage you.
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: Seawater application

What about using a dry system? Compressed air keeps the valve closed and the water out until a sprinkler operates.

RE: Seawater application

GRP is a strong candidate material.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.pdo.co.om/pdo/

RE: Seawater application

Need more specifics on the application:

Dry system or wet?
Standby pressure (if a wet system)?
Operating pressure?
If dry, how often is the system wetted for testing, and with what?
Land based, ocean structure, or ocean vessel?

As a general recommendation, use a copper alloy such as 90-10 or 70-30 CuNi (these are the standard alloys for US Navy ships).

RE: Seawater application

Hi,
GRP or GRE is a good solution, depending upon the media temperature ofcourse, if its buried line GRP?GRE is even better as it doesnt need protection from outside. Normal carbon steel piping with come internal coating such as glass flake etc. is a very good, proven and economical solution.  

RE: Seawater application

(OP)
Hi,
Thank you all for your input sofar! The original spec is indeed based on GRE/GRP. But now 316(L) stainless steel seems to be the selected material despite the fact that we already advised not to do so.
The system is wet and operating on a pressure of 16 barg at temperature of approx. 25 degr.C, and is circulating to avoid algal growth. But the system do have death ends.
All recommendations based on industrial practice or common sence makes sence, CuNi 90/10, GRE etc..
I'm just a piping engineer,so do anybody having ideas how to convince client based on corrosion (scientific) explanations?

Thanks again in advance.

Regards.

RE: Seawater application

I have a table (unfortunately only on paper, I can't find the electronic format) where it is clearly shown that 316L has corrosion rates in quiet seawater up to 5 mils/y (0,125 mm/y) depending on other factors like temp, type of seawater, steel surface conditions and so on. My recent experience talks about the use of 90/10 CuNi for seawater fire system. Consider that even if small amount of corrosion products is formed inside the pipe system, this can easily block the spray nozzles and the system would not work even if no part is actually damaged by corrosion.

RE: Seawater application

One significant difference between CuNi alloys and stainless steel is the likely form of corrosion.

CuNi tends to corrode uniformly at a very low rate, forming a weak passive film.  Crevice corrosion, should it occur, will manifest itself on the OUTSIDE of the crevice as opposed to inside the crevice.

Stainless steel for a stronger passive film, but are prone to pitting and crevice corrosion.  Pitting and crevice corrosion or localized corrosion, and will lead to failure much, much quicker than the corrosion you'll likely see on CuNi alloys.

RE: Seawater application

and you may also use GRP valves for the same reasons as GRP piping.

RE: Seawater application

You can go to the Nickle Institute (nidi.org) and get publications on the use of alloys in seawater.  Combine this with the similar info from copper.org and you can lay out your story.
As much as I love SS (it pays my bills) 90/10 is a much better option in stagnant seawater than 316.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion, every where, all the time.
Manage it or it will manage you.
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: Seawater application

Hi FKE,
Cu Ni 90/10 is good option for low velocities as the protective layer it forms is not so strong as in case of SS, in addition fabrication and maintenance is not so easy due to its poor weldeability, Cu-Ni fittings might be expensive for that working pressure.
On the other hand, GRP/GRE piping system has higher initial cost but very low operating cost due to minimum maintenance and longer life compared all other options.   

RE: Seawater application

(OP)
Hi,

Again thank you all for your responses.

I have checked the site of Outokumpu, www.outokumpu.com, and found a corrosion handbook free of charge. It's an interesting site anyhow. I have received a copy and it provides a lot of usefull info, also related to this thread.

Thanks!

Regards.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources