×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Catalyst

Catalyst

Catalyst

(OP)
When comparing catalyst prices, should one compare the cost per weight of catalyst or cost per volume of catalyst?  The catalyst pellets are similar in size and have similar compositions but one is reported with an 18% higher bulk density than the other.

RE: Catalyst

As a basis for the calculacions of a plant efficiency is the mass balance and because you are buying and paying catalyst per mass units it would be wise to compare efficiency per mass unit although you need some more calculations to get it.But however, compare apples to apples and pears to pears.
m777182

RE: Catalyst

Catalyst prices should be compared on the productivity in terms of product made.  It does not matter whether one is cheaper than another in terms of volume or mass of catalyst. All that counts is how much product you make for each dollar spent on calatyst.

RE: Catalyst

Normally, catalyst productivity is measured on how many kg of catalyst used to make one metric ton of polymer produced.
And before it is used, it needs to be activated to make it active and this process involves some weight loss like moisture and other volatiles.

RE: Catalyst


Costs of production including catalysts' useful lifes should be added in the economic analysis.

RE: Catalyst

Not all of the above is true IMHO.
First of all, catalyst, even presulfided, is paid on oxidic weight basis, so weight losses during in-situ activation are not relevant.

You may want to check the basis of the densities of the two cats, are both oxidic basis, are the measurement methods comparable? What about the void fractions, does one of the two give you a pressure drop advantage?

Then, know what the objective of your reactor: do you want to fill it with cheap cat for a low-severity service, you will want to take the cheapest per volume that does the job.

If you need the highest activity possible, ask your research lab to compare the iso-volume activities (the denser one is not necessarily more active) and see if the delta activity outweighs the delta price. Is troughput limited by this reactor's performance or by something else? Difference in expected lifetimes of both cats can be calculated from delta operating temperature (calculated from delta activity) versus max EOR temp assuming equal stability which may or may not be the case.

Yes it gets quite complicated if you want to do it right! Can't give you an easy recipe. Anyway, don't hesitate and make those cat vendors sweat for you, ask them for a design and compare the two.

RE: Catalyst

PS check also the regen/rejuvenation price, Type II cats are much more active than conventional but it's more expensive to achieve maximum activity recovery.
How often the cat can be regenerated depends 99% on your operation (feed quality), check the unit history.

RE: Catalyst

PS PS - Have you considered buying regenerated cat?

RE: Catalyst

If I remember well that the price depends on the gross volume of the catlyst to be provided by the vendor with some additional volume percentage (about 5%) due to losses during loading activities.
The gross volume will be calculated based on knowing the weight of the catalyst and its density.

Hope this would help you.

Cheers
Simulator
 

RE: Catalyst

(OP)
We have not considered buying regenerated catalyst.  I doubt we would be able to find any regenerated sour gas shift catalyst.

RE: Catalyst

Sour Gas Shift catalysts (catalyst that can perform the water - gas shift reaction in a high sulfur enviroment) have typically been sold on a volume basis. I do not believe that you will find any regenerated versions of the catalyst and there are only a couple of manufacturers. The two main ones that I know are Johnson Matthey and Unicat.

If I remember right, this is a mainly a Gross Surface Area reaction that is diffusion limited. You will need to see check the difference in metals loading between the two catalysts. Basically you are looking for accessible metal so bulk density may not actually give you more accessible active metal.

I would check the reference list for the catalyst and see if you can get any run length details on a simlar plant to your own. There are only a handful of sour shift applications in North America but I understand that Asia has a lot.

Hope this helps

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources