×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Software Safe

Software Safe

Software Safe

(OP)
Dear all,

I am currently working on the  design of a raft piled foundations of a tower in Singapour:
The design office uses the software safe to model the raft and puts springs to take into account the piles:

The questions are the following:

1) With Safe, Can we take into account the direct transmission of the loads into the piles? (to reduce the effect of bending into the raft)

2) Does the software safe take into account the rigidity of the superstructure that tends to reduce the bending moment in the raft.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Alan

RE: Software Safe

"safe" is an uncommon FE package, If you don't get any posts it's because no-one has used it rather than ignoring you.

RE: Software Safe

I have not personally used safe but would make the following comments from an engineering logic perspective for your 2 points

1  The piles, soil and raft will act together. You cannot asssume that some load will go directly into the piles as, when the piles shorten under load, some of the load will be trasnferred to the soil through the interaction of the 3 elements. That is what the finite elementanalysis is attempting to model for you.
The only way for load to go to piles only would be for the column and piles to be independent of the raft.

2  To allow for the rigidity of the superstructure you would need software that models the construction sequence with the loads being applied as the structure is constructed and then live loads added to the final structure. I do not think any of the CSI or many FEM products worldwide will do this for you. Doesn't safe only model the floor being designed? If so, it definitely cannot do this.

This actually shows the inaccuracy inherent in any analysis software for concrete buildings. FEM software is only accurate for the model that is defined. It cannot allow for inaccuracies in the model compared to real life (and these differences can be enormous) and cannot allow for inaccuracies in the modelling of the materials used, eg reinfoprced concrete cracks shrinks and creeps etc and the effects of these can be more than the vertical load effects and completely change the stiffness of the members in the model and consequently the results

RE: Software Safe

(OP)
Thank you very much for the answer.  
I precise that indeed my intention is to assume that the loads  inside the critical shear perimeter just go into the piles.
This doesn't seem yto be implicitly writen in the codes. I am currently working on BS.
The fact is that, they explain the cross section where critical shear has to be calculated but this point of direct transmission doesn't seem to be implicit in the codes.
If someone has informations on this point, that would be very nice.
I have received a demonstration of Safe, so I can see the features of Safes. But now, I am thinking about the concepts. We define critical shear at a certain distance of the periphery of the column, so What is inside just go directly to the piles. Am I wrong?

Thank you very much in advance.

RE: Software Safe

Soco,

See answer 1 above.

The piles will axially shorten due to the compression in them. Especially in a country like Singapore where the piles will be very long to reach stable foundation.

Also, the pliles will probably not be resting on solid rock so will settle further under compression load.

Because the piles and raft are connected and must settle together, these 2 effects above will cause some of the load to be carried by the piles and some by the raft. So you cannot assume all of the load from columns directly over or within the shear perimenter of piles will go into those piles.

If you are designing a piled raft, you have to determine the loads being carried by piles and raft based on the interaction of the 2 using a proper piled raft analysis and design each accordingly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources