×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Testing Labs

Concrete Testing Labs

Concrete Testing Labs

(OP)
I've been getting reports in on concrete break strengths for a project.  The majority of results of 7 day and 28 day strengths have seemed suspicious.  Today, I received a report of 2 sets of cylinder breaks.  The 7 day was 4,950 and 4,990 psi, respectively.  The 28 day strengths are 5,010, 5,020, and 5,060 for set one, and 5,130, 5,200, and 5,090 for set two.

Has anyone heard of only a difference in 100 psi for 7 day and 28 day strengths?  This concrete was normal weight, no special type of cement or curing admixtures used.  Similarly, on another report, I saw 7 day breaks at 3,100 psi and 28 day breaks at 3,200 psi.

I'm starting to think the testing lab is yanking my chain here.

RE: Concrete Testing Labs

I would guess that they are using a batch with Type III cement without knowing it.  I would go back to the plant supplying the concrete and verify the mix design.

RE: Concrete Testing Labs

Would ask the testing firm to explain results.  Could be simple typo errors or technician not knowing how to fill in the blanks.  Their reputation should mean a lot to them and funny numbers are bad for everyone.  Depending on size and importance of project, maybe you can make them do some field cores to verify in place strength.

RE: Concrete Testing Labs

One or more factors could be at play here, such as:

1. An accelerator or Type III cement as suggested by vmirat was used in the concrete mixture.

2. Cylinders were not properly cured in the field and or laboratory.

3. Mix-up in cylinders tested. This can happen when several classes(mix designs) of concrete are placed on the same day and identificaton of specimens is sloppy. The ability to track specimens with ID number and match them with location concrete was placed is very important.

4. Use of "magic pencil" to create results. Let's keep our fingers crossed that this was not the case.

A few questions:

(i) Did this problem happen for more than one different mix? I bring this up because some of the 28 day results are slightly over 5,000 psi and another one is just over 3,000 psi, suggesting more than one mix.

(ii) How do these results compare with results indicated in the mix design submitals? Mixes proportioned on the basis of statistical analysis of field data are recommended.

(ii) Have you ever visited the testing facility to examine their curing room, testing machines, calibration certs?

(iii) Is the testing lab accredited for testing concrete cylinders?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources