×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

(OP)
I'm currently designing a bridge abutment for a pre-engineered steel bridge.

I have done similar designs in the past.

The bridge is a 40'x16' single span with one fixed bearing and one expansion bearing.

A colleague advised me that I should design the abutment stem assuming that the bridge superstructure provides lateral support.

Through my research and study I have found that if a bridge has a fixed bearing at one end and an expansion at the other both abutments should be designed as free cantilevers.  Is this correct?  

Should the stem deflection be calculated to determine adequate stiffness?  If so, where could I find a good reference outlining this procedure?

Thank you for your time,

Wyoming E-I-T

RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

A few thoughts for your consideration......

For non-integral systems such as yours it is NOT common practice to utilize the bridge superstructure as lateral (longitudinal) support.

A common controlling load case for abutment designs is the construction case, when the abutment is partially or completely backfilled with a construction surcharge but without the superstructure dead load.  This typically controls the sliding check and possibly the stem reinforcing.

Another thought to consider is the appropriate earth pressure (active or at-rest) to use for the abutment design.  A very stiff abutment system and/or restraint provided by the superstructure could result in higher at-rest earth pressures that should be accounted for in the design.



RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

Ditto.  Also, you can check with the superstructure designer to see if the superstructure design did consider the abutment load, but I doubt it does.

RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

PS, I've worked on many designs for "pre-engineered" bridges and none of the superstructure designs considered any abutment loads.

RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

Far from providing support to the bridge, the superstructure actually passes on the braking forces to the abutments.

Ciao.

RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

(OP)
Thanks for all the feedback!

RE: Cast-in-Place Bridge Abutment

I too have designed many of these types of bridges.  Just design the abutments as cantilever stems using a suitable active soil pressure and some surcharge if appropriate.  I only allow that passive pressure which is in front of footing.  I also assume over time that the so called expansion end will not be fully sliding in future years due to dirt and lack of maintenance.  Consequently, I assume that 15% of the thermal force in the longitudinal direction will act horizontally at the bridge seat. The abutment should be designed for this force as well.

Good luck

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources