×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

unbraced length

unbraced length

unbraced length

(OP)
In truss, the top chord, I have 1.2M sp of purlins, can I use that as my UNL=1.2 and Ly=1.2? or my Ly is the default length?
 

RE: unbraced length

I usually like to separate my K and L when figuring buckling factors but you don't have to.  I put in my L as the actual unbraced lenth of the item which for a truss is probably different for LY and LZ.  This becomes a real problem when you have multiple nodes in between your bracing points because the program defaults to LY and LZ as the actual distance between nodes unless you tell it different. You add in your end constraints by KY and KZ

RE: unbraced length

Well, depending on the loading, I usually define unbraced length for top flange and bottom separately.  For instance, UNT=1.2 and UNB=span.  For roof beams, or top chords of trusses, uplift may govern the design due to longer unbraced lengths of the bottom flange of the beam.  THe purlins will brace the top flange, but unless kickers are used, they do nothing to brace the bottom flange.  So if you have a net uplift, or end fixity at panel points (like a continuous top chord of truss), I suggest using UNT & UNB instead of UNL.

Also, if you are going to use your purlins to brace the top chord, you will have to design the connection and the purlin itself to handle the axial force needed to provide bracing.  Traditionally this has been 2% of the compression force.  However, I think I have heard more recent studies which show that less force (say 1%) would also be acceptable.  I always use 2%, since that is what I know.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources