×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AASHTO 17th Ed. Interpretation

AASHTO 17th Ed. Interpretation

AASHTO 17th Ed. Interpretation

(OP)
I am performing a load rating of a steel multi-girder bridge with a concrete deck - a fairly routine analysis.  We have five girders, and the curb-curb width is 14 feet.  To determine the LL distribution for the interior girders, we used Table 3. 23.1 which gave us S/7 for a single lane.  For the fascia, it appears that we are limited by the provision of Section 3.23.2.3.1.5 giving us a minimum of S/5.5.  There is no provision for fascia girder distribution under a single lane.  If I go with a direct interpretation, my fascia girder would be subject to more load than the interior, even though a simple beam analysis would result in a significantly less load.  Any thoughts?

RE: AASHTO 17th Ed. Interpretation

It would help if you gave the girder spacing...I'm guessing it's around 3.5 feet?

Your interpretation of Section 3.23 is technically correct but I think what is missing is the intent of the specification.

It is my opinion the S/5.5 qualifier is intended for multi-lane bridges since it would be a rare occurance where you had 4 or more stringers and the bridge was designed for only one lane.

For your bridge with a concrete deck slab (very stiff) and closely spaced girders, the girders should be checked with the same DF.

The lower limit is #wheels/#girders which = 0.4 for your bridge.  This is the absolute lower limit allowed by AASHTO and would be used for LL deflection check and possibly design if a more precise method of analysis were used.

Assuming a 3.5 ft spacing, a one-lane DF = 3.5/7.0 = 0.5

For multiple lanes, DF = 3.5/5.5 = 0.64

Using the lever rule (simple span) and assuming a wheel could be located directly over the exterior stringer, the DF = 0.5.

It is my opionion the S/5.5 is too conservative here, and a DF = 0.5 should be used for the load rating regardless of the lever rule results (i.e. DF = S/7).



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources