Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
(OP)
I have a 200 HP Reliance motor, Model No. P44G5261, on a vertical sump pump that maintenance wants to operate as an on/off pump in case of heavy rain. Based on operation sequence, can anyone offer information on the pros and cons of going on/off versus VFD? Sump liquid is waste water with around 1.2 cP viscosity.





RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Any generators involved?
VFD could allow steady state matching of pump speed to in-flow.
May also allow greater surge capacity for the system. If large sudden in-flows are possible and the standard "wait until almost full" before starting pump,(to minimize cycling), is being used, you would have less available capacity compared to a VFD keeping the sump almost empty.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Consider a solid state soft starter. 1/5 to 1/10th the price of a VFD and it would eliminate the concerns over mechanical damage from frequent starting and stopping. Also, better soft starters now come with starts/hour lockout timers that would reduce the stress even further.
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Somehow, for this application, I think it might be better to allow the motor to run to destruction than to limit starts and allow flooding.
Probably better would be multiple pumps, set up such that higher liquid levels run more pumps and the lead pump alternates.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Rule of thumb is not more than four full voltage (DOL) starts per hour, spaced not less than 15 minutes apart.
With a soft start (not necessarily VFD) you can have a few more starts than four. If you can have the soft start that you do not exceed 100% of the FLA, you can have as many starts as you like. YOu need to consult the motor mfr for any starting current more than 100%.
FYI, a DOL start will have 600%-700% of the rated full load current (FLA).
A typical soft start can limit the starting current to 150 to 200% of the FLA.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
The energy disspated in the motor during starting is the same for DOL and for soft start, so if there is a thermal limit of fours starts per hour on DOL, the same limit would apply on soft start. There is however, considerable advantage in transient reduction, both electrical and mechanical and this will allow a much increased number of starts before the accumulated damage requires repair. This will enable a greater number of starts per hour provided that the thermal limitation is not exceeded.
"A typical soft start can limit the starting current to 150 to 200% of the FLA." Although a soft starter may be able to limit the start current to less than 200% current, the start torque developed by a motor at this current will not start a pump. Submersible pumps with long thin rotors will often start at 250 - 300%, but surface pumps can require up to 450% current to start them. This is a function of the motor starting characteristics and the pump torque curve.
Extended or frequent starting results in rotor damage rather than stator damage. RTDs do not help in this regard. A good thermal model designed and calibrated to match the motor characteristics is one of the best means of protection of the rotor.
Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
I somewhat agree with you davidbeach, but "run to destruction" is a term usually reserved for Fire Pumps, not storm water unless there is serious threat of loss of life involved. We don't really know anything like that about his application, and that is something that should have been addressed at the system design stage. gpape's post was in reference to what he already has to work with, a single 200HP pump. In that case, a soft starter is the optimum way to go IMHO.
Marke is correct, a soft starter will not extend the thermal capacity of the motor, nor will it decrease it either. It is exactly the same anount of energy as Across-the-Line, just stretched out over a longer period. There is some minor benefit to the cooling system of the motor having more time to dissipate it, but that is neglegible.
Side note: Nor will any soft starter be capable of starting a motor at 100% FLA. The physics don't work out. Some manufacturers make users to believe it will by allowing their adjustment range to go that low, but it s a false hope. I have never seen one start a motor with less than 150% current with any load connected, and that was a very light load.
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Thanks for expert input, specially for the heat dissipation. As for starting torque goes, most pump would start at reduced voltage, in fact they are the best candidates for the reduced voltage starter.
gpape:
So there is no advantege of thermal dissipation, I would say stay with what you have and need to stay with about 4 starts per hour, not less than 15 min apart.
jraef:
I agree, 100% staring current is stretching it, but some (chiller) vendors have professed that. 150% to 200% is a reasonable number for most pumps
Marke:
These questions are not to challage you, but for my benefit:
What contributes more to the heat build up? The fact that motor is at standstill at the start? The current have no effect?
Would you also say a squirrel cage rotor is more susceptible to heat, than the stator?
Thanks
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
During start, there is a lot of slip energy dissipated in the motor. This slip energy is dissipated in the rotor. In addition, there is energy dissipated in the stator due to the I2R losses, but it is the rotor energy that does the damage. The slip energy dissipated in the rotor is equal to the full speed kinetic energy of the driven load and motor. Motors are rated in the maximum rotor energy either by the maximum locked rotor time or the maximum load inertia.
When you apply a soft starter, you reduce the instantaneous start current, but you prolong the start time. The area under the curve should be the same. If you try to start at too low a current, you will dissipate more heat in the motor due to the pronlonged time that the motor is doing work at a higher slip.
The number of starts is realy a thermal issue. If you have a motor rated at 4 starts per hour and a rated maximum start time of 10 seconds, you can start considerabley mor frequently on a pump because the start tiem required for the pump is significantly less. If you take the maximum rated start time of the rotor multiplied by the rated number of starts, that gives you a maximum starting time per hour. Provided that the maximum starting time is less than the rated maximum starting time and the total time is less than the product of the maximum start time and frequency, you can safely increase the starts per hour on a soft starter. For example, 10 seconds maximum start time and 4 starts per hour, is the thermal equivilent of 8 5 second starts per hour and a pump DOL wil start in less than 5 seconds.
During start, the rotor is subjected to mor heat and is most likely to be damaged due to the high slip energy. During run, the slip energy is low and the stator is the thermal weak point.
Best regards,
Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
It is proved here (section 1n and 2 of the file)
http://
It is based on the equivalent circuit which gives us a means to determine current as a function of slip and torque as a function of slip. We know heating is integral I^2*r dt.. There is a tricky change of variables necessary to convert from integration over time to integration over slip. By the time you are done with the math there is not much intuition left, but the result is there.
The remaining sections of the document show how this result is modified when we add load. It turns out that total rotor heating during start of a loaded motor gets higher as we lower the voltage.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RH= Int{I^2R2 dt} =
= Int{I^2R2 / (ds/dt) ds}
What is ds/dt
dN/dt = T/J (f=ma type relationship)
N =(1-s)Nsync
dN/dt =-Nsync ds/dt = T/J
ds/dt=-T/J/Nsync
ds/dt = -1/(JNsync)*T = 1/J*[Pelec]/[N]
= -1/(JNsync)*[I^2R2*(1-s)/s]/[Nsync*(1-s)]
= -1/(JNsync)*[I^2R2/s]/[Nsync]
-I^2R2/[sJNsync^2] units Power / energy = time^-1
Substitute ds/dt into RH
RH = Int{-I^2R2 / (I^2R2/sJNsync^2) ds}
RH = Int{-sJ Nsync ds; s=0..sFinal}
= [-0.5JNsync^2*s^2@sFinal-s0]
sNsync=Nsync-N
= [-0.5J(Nsync-N)^2@sFinal-s0]
= [-0.5J(sFinalNsync)^2] - [-0.5J(s0*Nsync)^2]
= [-0.5J(s0*Nsync)^2] - [-0.5J(sFinalNsync)^2]
= 1/2*J*(N_sync*s_initial)^2 - 1/2*J*(N_sync*s_final)^2
Note – N and Nsync represent radian speed.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
RH = 1/2*J*(N_sync*s_initial)^2 - 1/2*J*(N_sync*s_final)^2
let s_initial=1, s_final=0
RH = 1/2*J*(N_sync)^2 = KE_final
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
The link helped.
Thanks electricpete.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Note this does not follow from conservation of energy. Assuming stator winding resistance was 0, the amount of energy we would have to put into the motor from the power system would be 2*KE. (1*KE would be converted rotor heat and 1*KE would be converted to rotor KE)
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
Let's say the motor is spinning at no-load speed. Now apply a dc current to the stator to create a stationary magnetic field (again no stator resistance).
There can be no work put into or out of the power system by the dc voltage since the stator field is stationary and rotor is rotatying.
The rotor will come to a stop. We have put no energy into or out of the motor from the power system as discussed above, so where did the rotor ke go? It will have to be dissipated in the rotor resistance. Therefore for this dc braking situation we can prove by conservation of energy that the energy dissipated in the rotor heating is equal to the initial rotor kinetic energy.
Now compare that situation to a rotor start and you will seee they are the same except for the frame of reference (rotating or stationary) and we expect the heating dissipated in the rotor the same either way.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Sequence of Operation for 200 HP motor
You cannot apply conservation of energy directly to a motor start to determine rotor heating = rotor KE.
But you can apply conservation of energy to the parallel situation of rotor braking using dc stator voltage to conclude rotor heating = rotor KE.
Analysis of these two scenario's shows that rotor heating should be the same so we can apply the braking result to the starting scenario.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.