API 6A PSL2/3 vs. API 6D
API 6A PSL2/3 vs. API 6D
(OP)
Our valves meet all requirements of API 6D. Potential customer has inquired if I can meet API 6A PSL2 or 3(obviously not in my possesion).
Valve is basic gas transmission type, trunion mounted,soft-seated, SA350LF2 construction, meets all requirements for NACE MR0175, full-bore (would pass drift test), and capable of passing hydrostatic and low or high pressure pnuematic testing.
Does PSL2 refer to testing criteria, materials of construction or both?
Valve is basic gas transmission type, trunion mounted,soft-seated, SA350LF2 construction, meets all requirements for NACE MR0175, full-bore (would pass drift test), and capable of passing hydrostatic and low or high pressure pnuematic testing.
Does PSL2 refer to testing criteria, materials of construction or both?





RE: API 6A PSL2/3 vs. API 6D
RE: API 6A PSL2/3 vs. API 6D
Clause 5 Materials General Requirements indicate the documents to be submitted by the manufacturer for the different PSL levels. There are a couple of pages for the requirements and hence I suggest that you get copy of API 6A