Steel Design Software
Steel Design Software
(OP)
I am looking for a good steel beam program. I would like something that will size multispan beams while considering various unbraced lengths at the top and bottom flange. Any suggestions?
When was the last time you drove down the highway without seeing a commercial truck hauling goods?
Download nowINTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Steel Design Software
Risa and RamSteel are other possibilities. StruCalc may do this, but I am not familiar with it.
RE: Steel Design Software
I don't know of any special purpose beam programs but you might find something by searching these forums. There have been some good spreadsheet sites mentioned in the spreadsheet area that would be worth a look.
Also try:
thread404-128331
http://www.freebyte.com/cad/
As SacreBleu mentions the analysis/design programs will do this but at a price. For example RISA $2000, Sap2000 $2000 and up, Multiframe3D $995, Multiframe2D $595, and many more. Be careful with the less expensive analysis programs, most do not do code checking which is what you seem to be looking for regarding unbraced lengths etc.
Sorry I don't have specific recommendations.
Regards,
-Mike
RE: Steel Design Software
I looked at Multiframe's website, but they do not make it clear what their pricing is. The code-checking is a separate program - is that included in $595 cost of Multiframe2D?
For "analysis only" of 2D frames, Enercalc has a free download of their FastFrame program. It is quite sophisticated for freeware.
RE: Steel Design Software
The "Multiframe Starter Bundle" which is 2D and the "Multiframe 3D Bundle" include the analysis, code checking, and section editor programs, and are priced at $595 and $995 respectively. The analysis only programs can be purchased separately at $295 and $595.
I have had the 3D package for about a month now and am impressed with its overall functionality and intuitive way of laying down the geometry. I haven't made up my mind yet about the code checking part, it seems ok but I have no experience with anything else to compare it to, and wouldn't want to influemce anyone with premature or bad information.
I think that the extent to which the analysis programs have picked up on the code checking part has had an impact on the availability of special purpose beam and truss design programs, which is probably what ntpe is looking for.
-Mike
RE: Steel Design Software
Good luck.
RE: Steel Design Software
RE: Steel Design Software
I just glanced at REI's STAAD.beam website. It mentions only ASD code check. Would that put it at a serious disadvantge for composite beams?
RE: Steel Design Software
RE: Steel Design Software
RE: Steel Design Software
RE: Steel Design Software
RE: Steel Design Software
If you're also in the market for something a little more general purpose, then RISA and SAP are both great. SAP is more technically correct and much more powerful but some think it's a bit more difficult to learn. I think it's more expensive also. The last time I checked, RISA was $1200 (a few years back) and SAP was $2000 (a very recent quote) for their base version. RISA used to have a 2D version that might be cheaper and should still take care of your continuous beams.
Although I have no proof that they're all bad, I would not design any actual building members with some Brand X program that I downloaded for cheap/free from the Internet. I would feel the need to spend so many hours checking it that I would be better off buying SAP at $2k.
If I was really worked up over price, I'd write the continuous beam stuff in Mathcad or Excel using the 3 and 4-span moment, shear, and deflection values from the AISC Manual. This could be done at home over a weekend. That would be close enough for 99% of continuous beams I've done. Then buy Ramsbeam for simple-span noncomposite and composite beams.
Another thing to think about: The 2005 AISC Spec has been released and is significantly different from the 3rd Edition LRFD Spec and in a different world than the 89 ASD (Allowable Stress Dinosaur) Spec. If you write your own, you can increase the service life by using the new Spec. If you buy something based on the obsolete stuff, then you're probably going to have to buy something else soon.
14159
RE: Steel Design Software
Dik
RE: Steel Design Software
Dik"
That brings up another idea. Does anybody have a continuous beam matrix displacement solution programmed into Mathcad? It seems like that would be child's play and would look cool too ;)
14159
RE: Steel Design Software
I've wanted to do this (matrix beam program) for a long time, but haven't gotten around to it yet. I would use "Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis" by Chu-Kia Wang for a reference, a simple but effective approach to learning matrix methods. Besides, I would use Mathematica which is used my me and maybe two others guys in structures.
Regards,
-Mike
RE: Steel Design Software
The advantage of matrix methods is that you can accurately compute moment and deflections for beams with complex loads. The original Enercalc ran on Lotus 123 and I believe that its beam analyzers used matrix methods. I never really got into matrix mathematics since I graduated from college.