×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CMU Wall Corners...

CMU Wall Corners...

CMU Wall Corners...

(OP)
Good morning.

I have a general question about masonry load-bearing wall construction. Considering a typical exterior building wall corner, constructed of load-bearing CMU in running bond. Assume that no control joint was indicated to be located precisely at the corner; neither by the structural drawings, nor the architectural drawings.

With only these facts in mind, and under conventions of construction typical in the masonry industry of today, would I be more likely to end up with a wall corner that was constructed integrally (i.e. one wall “tied” to the other by “toothing in” of units), or rather should I expect these walls to be constructed structurally separate from one another?

Any insight, from your unique perspectives in the industry, would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Walterbrennan

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

I would expect the corner to be fully bonded. We don't expect control joints to be added at locations not shown on the drawings, especially when it may affect the integrity. Do the walls span vertically or horizontally?

I would hope that you could point to some statement in your structural notes or specifications regarding bonding at intersecting walls. If the project is small and perhaps does not have notes or specifications, you should still be able to require the contractor to follow the governing code requirements. For instance, the section in IBC 2000 that you need to refer to is 2109.7.2, Intersecting walls. If the governing code references ACI 530-99, then check out 5.8.2.

I hope this helps!

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

The wall corner should be constructd in running bond as jike mentions. Corner "Dur-O-Wal" reinforcement shoulkd be used, or at least corner bars to lap with the bond beam reinforcement. For lighter construction, one vertical should be at corner, but most offices use 3 verticals (one each adjacent cell in addition to corner).

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

(OP)
jike,

The walls I was thinking of were reinforced to span vertically to a roof or floor diaphragm. Which means, since ACI 530 section 5.8.2 talks about masonry walls, “… depending upon one another for lateral support…”, it's not really a concern, here. And, looking at section 1.9.4.1 (b) (also ACI 530), as long as the transfer of shear is completely avoided at intersecting walls (i.e. control joint right at the corner/intersection, and no bars, joint reinforcing, etc. from wall to wall), then the code has been satisfied there, as well.

For a wall designed to span vertically, and resist in-plane shear adequately, it shouldn’t be a big concern, analytically. But from a redundancy standpoint… well, solid corners just make a guy feel better than corners that are built up to one another.

Anyway, I’m really just wondering, from a state of the industry standpoint, whether masons are still (generally) building FROM the corner (solid, interlocked), as opposed to building TO the corners (control joint at the corner); in the absence of any other direction… (like most things in building construction, used to be a time when it was just taken for granted...!)

Let me know what you're seeing, out there.

Thanks,

Walterbrennan

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

I dont know what they do in the rest of the country but everywhere I have lived teh corners are construted as per Jike.

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

There are some buildings that we have done where the architect wants a full height window at the corner. Obviously, in this case the masonry is not tied together at the corner. It does not present a problem if the wall is continuously supported at the floor and roof.

The only drawback that I can see about not tying the corner together is that when the sun hits one side and not the other, one wall will bow and the other will not. Maintaining a caulk joint and prevent water infiltration may become a problem. Appearance may also be a problem.

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

I have put in the general notes that wall intersections shall be toothed. With the wall corners locked together, I feel it helps with in plane overturning for short shearwalls. I wouldn't want a control joint here.

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

haynewp,
Speaking of short shearwalls, is there anything in the IBC or ACI-530 that shows how to take advantage of the "return" around the wall corner to increase shear capacity (actually overturn resisting and reduction of tension/compression at each end)?
Does any one have a spreadsheet solution to this?

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

Asked a contractor here in Connecticut.  He said they never put a control joint at the corner, unless it's specified on the drawings.

RE: CMU Wall Corners...

I know 530-99 has section 1.9.4 that addresses intersections and in the commentary CC-13.

The Reinforced Masonry Eng. Handbook has examples on p. 125 of this.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources