OPINIONS
OPINIONS
(OP)
I enjoy dealing with people with firm opinions, especially if they agree with my opinion. That is not necessary, but it makes life simpler.
I do remember not having an opinion on a topic, but that got me prosecuted (from a prosecutor son).
I pleaded fatherhood and he quit.
"There are actually men who through fear of unpopularity will not dare to express their opinions, however excellent." On Moral Duties, Cicero
jimbo
I do remember not having an opinion on a topic, but that got me prosecuted (from a prosecutor son).
I pleaded fatherhood and he quit.
"There are actually men who through fear of unpopularity will not dare to express their opinions, however excellent." On Moral Duties, Cicero
jimbo
Buy a dictionary, keep it nearby and USE it. Webster's New World Dictionary of American English is recommended, and Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.





RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
Can't think who said it, but true enough.
A difference of opnion is a far greater incentive to creative thinking than a shared opinion.
People who share opinions and band together find strength not in the turth of their views but in their numbers and use that strength to tyranise others.
The truth is elusive but opinions flourish.
JMW
www.ViscoAnalyser.com
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
Sadly, people continue to hold untenable opinions, even in the face of overwhelming new evidence to the contrary. Maybe the earth is flat.
John
RE: OPINIONS
In short, it is our unverbalized assumptions that will confirm or refute our positions.
Erik
RE: OPINIONS
Wisdom changes hands among the wise.
RE: OPINIONS
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who do not believe, no proof is possible." Stuart Chase
"If you are going to walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!"
RE: OPINIONS
corus
RE: OPINIONS
I think one of the toughest hurdles for anyone is to recognize the difference between what one knows and what one believes. Further, I think it is a sign of wisdom when one comes to the realization that when dealing with philosophical beliefs, it is not a matter of right and wrong, it is a matter of difference.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
Are you saying their is no right and wrong? Further, do you believe there is one ultimate truth?
Some people believe (myself included) that a single truth exists, and we are simply seek to understand it. Others believe truth is relative, such that your truth and my truth could be different.
Neither of these can be definatively proven. Both are fundemental to anyone's formation of a world view.
RE: OPINIONS
As far as answers to your specific questions, I'd be more than happy to engage, but I'm not sure this is right place for it.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
When it comes to mathmatical equasions, two people working the same problem with the same methods will probably come to the same solution. In life, in matters of observation, where people use thier minds to interperet data, truth is subjective and open to debate... always.
RE: OPINIONS
Not trying to be a smart ass or anything... Just pointing out the obvious.
RE: OPINIONS
You can say the stop sign is red. I can say the stop sign is an octagon. Both of our truths are valid as they don't contradict.
But, I can say 2 + 2 = 5 and you can say 2 + 2 = 4. No matter how much I believe 2 + 2 = 5 is my "truth", it's still incorrect.
Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas
"All the world is a Spring"
All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.
RE: OPINIONS
Are you absolutely sure?
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
In other words at the core of math are beliefs not truths.
With a different set of beliefs maybe we have some other truths such as that 2+2=5.
JMW
www.ViscoAnalyser.com
RE: OPINIONS
...for sufficiently large values of 2.
Hg
Eng-Tips guidelines: FAQ731-376
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
corus
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
http
An interesting read.
Oh yes, there is a saying:
"Chemists defer to Physisists, Physisists defer to Methematicians, Mathematicians defer to God." (Engineers are not mentioned.)
JMW
www.ViscoAnalyser.com
RE: OPINIONS
I think you'll find they are - God, the greatest engineer of them all
(If you believe in that sort of thing)
RE: OPINIONS
JMW
www.ViscoAnalyser.com
RE: OPINIONS
Truth can never be relative by definition.
What is true can only be true. If it can be made to be false then it was never a truth to begin with - just an assumption or an opinion.
To perceive a truth to be false makes one a liar to oneself.
This is probably why so many Engineers think they are God.
RE: OPINIONS
Those 'beliefs' are the fundamental axioms of mathematics. These are statements that we faithfully accept as being true, and they form the foundation upon which all mathematics is built. As an example, Euclidean Geometry is based on the following five axioms.
If any of these beliefs turns out to be false, then Euclidean Geomety will crumble, and so will all of its proofs. Many consider Peano's axioms to be the foundations of arithmetic itself, not the least of which is the fifth axiom: "If a set of numbers S contains 0 as well as the successor of every number in S, then every number is in S." That axiom is critical to inductive proofs. That axiom has not been proven, yet that belief forms the basis of all inductive proofs. If it turns out to be false, then every inductive proof comes into question. Also, please note that the axiom is based on set theory, which itself contains 10 fundamental axioms.
Mathematics is a beautiful system, and much work has been done, and is being done, about its consistency and completeness, but as jmw states, "at the core of math are beliefs not truths".
"We hold these truths to be self-evident ..." because as of yet, none of them have been proven.
If mathematics is pure science, and mathematics is axiomatic, then so too must science be axiomatic.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
==> If so then mathematics, science and religion (which is highly axiomatic) are pretty d@mn closely related.
It is my personal opinion that the three are far more closely related than most are comfortable admitting.
However, in all fairness to math and science, they rigorously and formally try to show that their axiomatic systems are consistent, i.e. that you cannot derive a statement from the axioms that contracts an axiom. Further, any claim made by math or science must be derivable from the axioms. That essentially is what a math proof is. It is the logical derivation of a claim from the fundamental axioms.
I find religion to be far less formal or rigorous.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
Also, is there a difference between a "regular" theory and a scientific theory?
To me, a theory is conjecture or an explanation based on observations and assumptions. I agree with Cajun that a hypothesis is expected to be proven or disproven, whereas I don't think that's necessarily true for a theory (but maybe can be).
I've also come to the conclusion that when people use the phrase "scientific theory," they mean "hypothesis."
Then again, maybe these are just my personal conventions.
RE: OPINIONS
How can you have a personal convention? We can all have our own personal definitions, which may be right or wrong to varying degrees, but a convention implies agreement with something or somebody.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
In regards to people with firm opions who like to argue, which I was in my yonger years; I found that things changed as I got older.
My willingness to hold strong and debate my viewpoint decressed, not only because my self-rightous decreased but also because as I became more experienced in life, I relized how little I really know.
But today I enjoy discovering the subtlies of arguments, that can be learned from books like "The Book of the Fallacy", by Pirie Madsen which can be viewed on the Adam Smith Society website.
Thanks
RE: OPINIONS
RE: OPINIONS
By my understanding:
-All science begins with observation
-The most crude form of science is to classify the observations
-A less crude science makes correlations amongst the observations (We've always observed A and B happening together / We've always seen A or B, but never both/ etc.)
-The ultimate form of science achieved by man to date is the effect-cause-effect method (it shows causality) also known as the scientific method
In the effect-cause-effect method, we start with an observation or axiom. We then speculate as to the cause of the observations (hence the observation is an effect). When we have a predicted cause, or hypothesis, we then determine something else which we believe must be true if the cause exists. A test or experiment is then devised to determine if the predicted effect can be found. If and only if the effect is found, then a new theory is made:
(predicted cause) causes (observed effect).
This theory is valid, at minimum, over the range of conditions in which it has been tested. In order to be true it must be tested over all conditions to be proven true; hence science cannot prove anything - it can only show validity. If in the future a condition is found where the theory can be shown to be false, a limit to the validity of the theory is formed. As an example, we know Newton's Laws of Motion are not true (first shown by Einstein). Yet Newton's Laws of motion are valid under a very wide range of conditions.
RE: OPINIONS
I am humbled everyday of my life by something. The more I learn, the more I realize that I don't know very much in the grand scheme of things.
I used to LOVE to debate and argue, but not much anymore. Life is short, very very short and I now try to keep an open mind and do ALOT more listening and learning. I have my beliefs and values of course, but striving to improve, grow, learn and become a better engineer and human being is what's really important to at this time.
With an engineering degree, working on my PCS, (Professional Soils Classifier license) and I still feel sometimes like I don't know a darn thing! Is anything truly mastered and understood? No.. It seems I've got alot more learning and studying to do. Will the reading studying and learning ever end!!!! NO.
It's amazing! The more you study, learn and understand, the more you realize how little you know.
Existance exist. I deal with it one day at a time.
This is good forum, enjoy the metal stimulation.
Ray
RE: OPINIONS
o•pin•ion P Pronunciation Key ( -p n y n)
n.
1. A belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof: “The world is not run by thought, nor by imagination, but by opinion” (Elizabeth Drew).
2. A judgment based on special knowledge and given by an expert: a medical opinion.
3. A judgment or estimation of the merit of a person or thing: has a low opinion of braggarts.
4. The prevailing view: public opinion.
5. Law. A formal statement by a court or other adjudicative body of the legal reasons and principles for the conclusions of the court.
My Holt dictionary number one (1.) definition is similar with the above number one (1.) definition but reads as follows:
A belief or statement based at least partly on one’s judgment rather than upon clear or proven fact; notion; view.
It appears from this definition that facts should not dissuade, corrupt, or impinge upon ones opinions. That’s just my opinion with tongue in cheek.
Cajun: Have you ever heard of Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance? This is only one tome of a plethora of rigorous studies of a religion but don’t let the facts construe your opinion.
There is a famous document that includes the words,” …We hold these truths to be self evident…”
This statement is suggestive to many that there is such a thing as absolute truth and that some truths are more obvious than others. The axioms which form the basis of mathematics are prime examples. The truth of these axioms is self evident to the point that no one would challenge their veracity taken in context. And for that matter why would one want to take them out of context? OK for the sake of argument one can take it out of context but then I must argue that you have taken it out of context and therefore your argument in invalid.
RE: OPINIONS
For the longest time it was self-evident that the earth was flat.
You do make a valid point about 'context', and that axiomatic veracity is limited to their context. The axioms of mathmeatics that I presented are in the context of Euclidean geomety. I agree that you cannot take them outside of the context Euclidean geometry, but I ask you, how applicable to reality is the context of Euclidean geometry? Not all of the axioms hold in ellptic or hyperbolic geometry.
Yes, I've heard of, but I'm not particularly familiar with Strong's Exhaustive Concordance. Are you suggesting that because of this, and/or in conjunction with other similar rigorous and exhaustive studies, that religion, or more to the point in this case, Christianity, can be derived from a set of fundamental axioms in a specific context?
If so, then please define the context, and enumerate the axioms within that context.
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: OPINIONS
Although I believe there is intimate connection of most these ideas, I am not into religious apologetics and had intended the folowing to start a new paragraph but when I submitted to Post it deleted the spaces before..." There is a famous document"... In other words, I was addressing about three different people and jumbled things a little so that the context was agglomerated. I trust this sounds sufficietly vague.
I was simply surprised that someone of your intellect would use unsubstantiated lack of rigor as a criteria of comparison in that context.
RE: OPINIONS
"There are always three sides to any issue - yours, mine, and the truth."
That one line has served me well in a variety of situations - design discussions, contract negotiations, personnel issues.
RE: OPINIONS