×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wood deck design 97 UBC

Wood deck design 97 UBC

Wood deck design 97 UBC

(OP)
Is there a requirement for structural members exposed to weather (deck joists, girders and posts) to be pressure treated or naturally resistant to decay? Project is in
Lake Tahoe area.

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

There isn't....assumption is that wood will be painted or stainbed to protect against weather. You certainly will get long-lasting snow in that area.

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

(OP)
Thanks for the quick response!

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

If you are in California I understand that you are still using the 97 UBC. Section 2306.12 Weather Exposure (page 2-276) seems to say that you need "wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood".
I had a project, in the State of Washington, where the contractor did not follow the drawings (which called for P.T. wood)and installed non pressure treated beams under an outdoor deck. When the building inspector noted the variance the owner got around the issue by saying that he would coat the structure with some Snake-oil and deal with the potential reduced life of the structure.
That's my Two-Bits worth.

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

OldPaperMaker,
Does that section relate to wood within 18" of the ground surface?
I have done many exposed lumber structures, especially heavy timber structures. The have never been pressure-treated or naturally decay-resistant timbers. However, for 2 x lumber, I think you definitely have a point.
I have been involved hith a custom home building company that  designs/builds post and beam frame type homes. They used decay-resistant wood, which makes sense because you don't want an expensive home that needs constant painting or staining.

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

(OP)
FYI, I have sent an email to Eldorado County building dept. to get their take on this question, but I know Carson City, NV has interpreted it to require p.t. or redwood. when I hear from them I'll let you know.

RE: Wood deck design 97 UBC

For what it is worth, locally here in the SW USA where I do most work, many towns are under 1997 UBC, and do not require PT or decay-resistant wood for exposed decks. The annual rainfall is less than 9", and snow is short-lived. Any exposed wood posts for the deck (if not stucco-wrapped) are merely painted.
We recently did a custom home where a portion of the roof trusses are exposed and painted (that does make me nervous).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources