×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PPE - 29 CFR 1910.269 Hot Gloves
2

PPE - 29 CFR 1910.269 Hot Gloves

PPE - 29 CFR 1910.269 Hot Gloves

(OP)
I have a question about the issuing of rubber insulating gloves: Are they to be issued to employees or are they allowed to be a "community" type of Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE).  I thought at one time OSHA (29 CFR 1910.269) stated that gloves would be worn by only one person, but now I don't seem to be able to find anything on it.  Personaly, I think they should be issued to personnel - I know I wouldn't trust any gloves that weren't in my possesion from the moment they had been inspected.  Any help would be greatly appreciated....jimi

RE: PPE - 29 CFR 1910.269 Hot Gloves

I don't know the answer to your question, but I think your gut instinct is right on the money.

RE: PPE - 29 CFR 1910.269 Hot Gloves

2
The employer must assess the workplace for electrical hazards and the need for PPE under 29CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i). Details on how to comply with this standard is up to the employer. The employer is expected to use the best means available to comply with this requirement, and that is done through consensus standard NFPA 70E. Compliance with 70E will assure compliance with this OSHA requirement. In the event of an injury or death due to an electrical accident, if OSHA determines that compliance with 70E would have prevented or lessened the injury, OSHA may cite the employer under the general duty clause. In 2003 “Standards Interpretation” letter OSHA stated 70E can be used as evidence of whether the employer acted reasonably.
Having said that I personally have not seen many employer's doing the flash hazard analysis and mandating the wearing of PPE of their employee's. Maybe eventually law suits,insurance rates will force that.
But in a somewhat longwinded answer to your question:
Proper care and use of PPE is an important part of
any electrical safety program. PPE should be
inspected before every usage. PPE should be maintained
in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. Improper care of PPE can cause the equipment to lose its protective properties. For example, rubber goods can lose some of their insulating properties if not properly stored and protected from corrosive materials. Rubber goods may
require periodic dielectric testing to verify the insulating capabilities. FR clothing may require special care during laundering and may need to be replaced if torn
or if fabric becomes worn after prolonged usage.

David Baird
mrbaird@hotmail.com
Sr Controls Designer
EET degree.
Journeyman Electrician.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources