×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sacrificial Thickness for Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling

Sacrificial Thickness for Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling

Sacrificial Thickness for Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling

(OP)
Is there a US Code that has information about sacrificial thickness to add to steel sheet piling in corrosive environments?  

RE: Sacrificial Thickness for Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling

I have experience with fender piles for submarines. The piles are 90 feet deep. About 45 - 50 feet is embedded in soil. A portion of the fender piles were in ocean water and a part is in open salty air with plenty of chlorides. The following is what I observed during recent upgrades:

1. The potion of the piles that was embedded deep in soil was amazingly clean and no corrosion was observed. As a matter of fact we used these pieces to make up new piles for the client. This has been attributed to lack of oxygen.

2. The portion of the piles that was in the water and splash zones was severely corroded. Keep in mind that marine grade steel (ASTM A690 “High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel H-Piles and Sheet Piling for Use in Marine Environments”) was used for these H piles.

3. The portion that was in the open air suffered medium corrosion.

4. Under the upgrades, we provided inorganic zinc coating and cathodic protection, by using sacrificial anodes. We used aluminum blocks that are supposed to last 15 years. They were over 200 pounds each.

In my practice, I always require specialized coating such as inorganic zinc, hot dip galvanizing or cathodic protection to shield the steel. I have heard of some engineers who increase the thickness of the steel members to account for corrosion. Personally I do not subscribe to this theory simply because you can never estimate the actual loss of section and duration for the loss to take place.

Few years back, I began to add a note to my drawings that in essence puts the  onus on owners by stating that structure do require routine maintenance and that they are responsible for doing it to keep the structures functioning properly and for it to retain its structural integrity.

I am not aware of a code that allows or requires thickness increase.

Regards,

Regards,
Lutfi

RE: Sacrificial Thickness for Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling

Go to my web site (link below). Then go to the "Steel Sheet Piling & H-Piles" page. Download "NBS Monograph 58, Corrosion of Steel Sheet Piling In Soil"

On the same page, also suggest you download "Bethlehem Steel H Piling". Look on page 27 for more on steel pile corrosion.

Concur with Lutfi about the lack of code requirements on this subject. Use engineering judgement.

www.SlideRuleEra.net

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources