×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds
2

hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

(OP)
I have used Kirpich formula for calculating the time of concentration for small watersheds,however for large watersheds it is giving conservative results"shorter duration " compared to other methods as the Kinematic wave equation which is developed by the University of Maryland & is recommended by Federal Highway Administration for overland flow.
my question can we use the wave equation to calculate the time of concentration for large watersheds(10sq miles or larger)

RE: hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

For large watersheds I have in the past used USGS or similar type regression equations to estimate a peak flow for varied design storms.  They require no time of concentration, generally just a drainage area.  Our DOT uses their own as does TVA.  If you require a hydrograph try several different Tc methods until you get SCS peak flows similar to what the regression equations gave you.  If this doesn't help you might try posting this in the Storm/Flood engineering forum.

RE: hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

I agree w/ sam.  For anything over a sq mile or two, use a statistical model (if you are in PA, USA, PSU-4 is universally accepted, including PennDOT).  Creating hydrographs will lead to excessive design flows, and, therefore, overdesign.

Remember: The Chinese ideogram for “crisis” is comprised of the characters for “danger” and “opportunity.”
-Steve

RE: hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

Regression equations in our area (South Texas) resulted in unrealistic Q's. We have been monitoring bridge structures with different frequencies. Reg. Equ.'s indicate W.S. elevations higher than bridge elevations at 25 and 100 yr frequencies, yet we have never seen those bridges go under water.

RE: hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

Been watching those bridges for 25 to 100 years?

RE: hydrology-Time of concentration for large watersheds

As far as I know, Regression Equations are widely used for such things as flood plain studies, bridge design, channel design, etc.  They are not "accurate" in the sense that they typically have errors of plus or minus 30%, or more. Still, they are the best available estimates for larger watersheds. The only thing better would be a nearby stream gage with a long period of record.

Unless one has a long record of flows at a bridge site, it is probably not wise to trust anecdotal evidence. Just knownig that a bridge has not been overtopped in recent years wouldn't tell you very much unless you can relate flows, water surface elevations and probability of recuurance over a significant period of time.

good luck

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources