×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

why no copper parts in PSV

why no copper parts in PSV

why no copper parts in PSV

(OP)
There are no parts on pressure relief valve made from copper. Why is that?

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

carol2005,

I have seen lots of bronze pressure relief valves.  Most bronze is >80% Cu.

Why do you ask?

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

(OP)
I guess my question is misleading. I've seen PSV and ERV specification require no aluminum or copper parts. I understand aluminum can not stand for high temperature. But I am not sure under what applications, copper is not allowed on pressure relief devices. Please advise.

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

just a guess.  could it be related to the fluid/gas.  while brass would be fine for lube oil, i wouldn't think so for amounia.

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

Some lube oils contain sulfur, both from the constituency of the base crude stock, and as an additive for anti-wear purposes, so brass wouldn't be indicated for that service either.

Obviously, carol2005, the specification you were reading was dealing with either a pressure issue, or a chemical issue where brass would not suffice for the service.

Do you have any insight as to what type of service the PSV's in question were for?

I used to use PSV's on seawater service, and they were 100% bronze for obvious reasons.

rmw

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

Here's my take on the Copper part of the question.

Copper being so maleable, a SV made of it would easily distort from piping loads, vibration and the like. The body could possibly creep due to the disc closing spring forces. The corrosion patina could interfere with moving parts and jam up the works, any heat would reduce ultimate strength and further exacerbate distortion issues.

If the body distorted, alignment would be affected and the SV would most likely pass/leak. If the disc was copper too, then the metal to metal seat would probably be chewed out in no time flat as well.

Cheers

Rob
BUT, add some alloying elements to copper and you get a much hardier material aka brass / bronze etc...

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

In the refinery industry I've see spec's call for "no yellow metal" due to the reaction with H2S (sulfur) as rmw pointed out.

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

When a fluid contains (sodium) cyanide, aluminium and copper (and their alloys) are not allowed for not being compatible.

RE: why no copper parts in PSV

Could it be a fire rating issue given the low melting point of copper, aluminium etc?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources