INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

ASCE 37-02

ASCE 37-02

(OP)
I just bought a copy. Anyone else have one? I am interested in sharing my thoughts...

RE: ASCE 37-02

I have one, construction loads correct?

RE: ASCE 37-02

(OP)
Yep!

I've just started reading it and noticed that it references ASCE 7-95 rather than ASCE 7-98 or 7-02. I haven't gotten too far into 37-02 yet. Anything I could stand to be warned about?

RE: ASCE 37-02

I haven't read much of it either.  I bought it more because of the discount and the "might need it someday" factor.  It's an interesting read for what I've seen.

RE: ASCE 37-02

(OP)
I just finished reading it three times over...

I'm somewhat "concerned" that it references ASCE 7-95. Should I be troubled that seismic loads during construction conform to ASCE 7-95 rather than 7-02? I almost feel like annotating ASCE 37-02 in order that it might be up to speed with ASCE 7-02 for seismic and wind.

Even thoguh I read through the Standard and Commentary three times, I might have missed the part about adopting more recent standards/codes.

What does genuinely irk me is that I paid for a "new" copyright 2002 standard that contains *some* information that's ten years old.

I am also irked that this "standard" was sold to me for $35 rather than the $15 it's worth (in terms of volume - 33 pages long, in terms of obsolete information - most of it). I suppose I could see paying $35 for the Standard AND a work book of problems, but ASCE gouged me on this and I'm a member, too! Argh!

I purchased ASCE 37-02 because, for the last several months, I've been requring construction contractors to be in conformance with it. I figured with a title like "Design Loads on Structures During Construction" I couldn't go wrong. Then again, what the heck was I doing specifying something I didn't have! Shame on me. Indeed...

Thoughts? Anyone out there have similar or better/worse stories?

RE: ASCE 37-02

Indeed, though it is interesting to see how the ASCE handles construction loads, they did us wrong by charging so much for a little pamphlet that references an old document.  I think they could have done better with keeping it up to date, at least by referencing the 7-98.  

Are there any problems with the change from fastest mile wind speeds to 3-second gust?  The 7-95 is before my time honestly but I know around there somewhere, I believe with the 7-98, the design wind velocity changed from using the fastest mile to the 3-second gust.

RE: ASCE 37-02

UcfSE:

ASCE 7-95 used 3-second gust speeds for wind loads.  

I gave ASCE 37-02 a very cursory look, I think it would be appropriate to use ASCE 7-02 provisoins for wind & seismic.  The load combinations and load factors in ASCE 37-02 seem to match the ones in ASCE 7-02 quite closely.  I'm not familiar with the seismic provisions in ASCE 7-02, 7-98 and 7-95.  I think it is apprpriate to substitute the more current code provisions, even if the code and the commentary in ASCE 3-02 makes no mention of that.  


Regards,


chichuck

RE: ASCE 37-02

Why are we looking at Seismic loadings for construction operations? That seems like it could be a significant waste of the owner's money.

RE: ASCE 37-02

(OP)
DRC1,

You have a point. It's addressed in ASCE 37-02, though. The purpose of ASCE 37-02 is to provide a standard for construction works - and the standard takes into account the time/duration of construction, which takes into account the liklihood of an earthquake during that period, etc.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close