×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

hi-locks with interference

hi-locks with interference

hi-locks with interference

(OP)
Hi,

For strucural parts, what is the best mounting ? Hi-locks with interference or hi-locks with clearance ? I know of course that using of hi-locks with interference is better concerning fatigue performance but for assembly and process matters which is better ?

RE: hi-locks with interference

Know of one aircraft company that used interference holes in titanium pylon structure with dry film lubricated c/sk Hi-Lites.  They were finding the heads were continually proud.  Turns out the installation in the hard material was scraping off the dry film lube which bunched up under the head and did not allow the head to seat properly.  They changed the fit to a "transition fit".

RE: hi-locks with interference

Obviously interference fit gives a better hole filling factor, but it should be noted that Hi-loks are not preferred for interference fit/fatique situations. Note that radius-lead-in type fasteners are preferred for interference and fatigue (see Hi-shear fasteners like Hi-lite's).  If I remember correctly, hi-lites have a rounded edge at end of shank near the threads (to reduce scoring the inside surface of the hole) and a slightly different radius between shank and head (to reduce the chance of fatigue which could possiblty causes heads to break-off).  They have a slight variation in the collars, also, when compared to hi-loks.
It is true that interference fit in titanium is not a good application.  Some of the big companies prefer close tolerance fit (which is zero clearance to a low clearance) to transition fit.  

RE: hi-locks with interference

i'd install Hi-Loks to the process that Hi-Shear specify.  By their nature, Hi-Loks develop some beneficial interference, but nothing i'd take into account in analysis (unless i had to !).  If you're looking to maximise fatigue performance, Hi-Tigues (i think, gosh knows where that name came from!!) are better (and probably more expensive).

RE: hi-locks with interference

I'm not a structures specialist, but from what I've seen, holes for high performance shear fasteners (like Hi-Loks) are drilled, reamed and "coined", in order to maximize fatigue properties.  If the hole is coined, I don't really see that an interference fit of the fastener would provide additional benefit.  At least in regards to the increased difficulties it would present at assembly.

Of course with rivets, this is not an issue, because the rivet body swells to fill the hole when it is "bucked".

As a side note, most (shear type) Hi-Lok's used on commercial aircraft are titanium bodies (with DFL) and aluminum collars (with a cetyl alchohol lube).  The cost break for most commercial aircraft is over $300/lb, so even titanium fasteners at $50/lb are cost effective.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources