×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Motor starting current and genset size

Motor starting current and genset size

Motor starting current and genset size

(OP)
We have had a problem at a sanitary lift station and would appreciate any comments or suggestions.  

The station is equipped with two (2) 28.2 HP (21.0 kw)submersible pumps and a 80 kw diesel generator with an 200A automatic transfer switch.  The generator is sized ot operate two motors on a staggered start sequence.

The pumps operate fine when connected to utility power.  When the pumps are operated via the stand by generator, the across line motor starter will "chatter" briefly (less than 1 second).

The submersible pump motor has a full load amp rating of 32.3 amps at 480 volts, and operates at 3450 RPM.  The published locked rotor current for the motor is 245 amps.  The NEMA code rating for the motor is "H".

During operation from the utility power, the in rush current has been measured between 380 amps and 420 amps (depending on leg and test). This was measured with a Fluke model 453(?).

When the generator attempts to start one of the pump motors, the control voltage will drop from 120 volts to ~ 75 volts.  The control transformer is 5 kva. Two different transformers have been installed, with the second unit incorporating taps to try to provide some adjustment.  The only items requiring control power at this point are the coils of the motor starter.  There have been two different manufacturers of motor starters installed in the control panel

The submersible pump manufacturer states that the inrush current is with in an acceptable limit of 10 to 15 times FLA.  They also state that since the units operate on utility power the issue is with the gen set.

The generator has had the voltage regulator changed, and the voltage has been adjusted to provide between 460 volts to 502 volts.  The same results have occured. During the last round of testing , one of the units stopped "chattering", but the other unit has not (for no apparent reason or adjustment).

We would appreciate any type of response as we are currently baffled.



RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Review FAQ  FAQ237-766

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

The starter contactor can drop out at anything less than 85% rated voltage.  At 75% control voltage, I suspect your contactor is just having a tough time pulling in. The voltage regulator/generator system cannot react fast enough to avoid this transient voltage dip.  The fact that one contactor seems OK and the other has problems could be due to manufacturing tolerances, or could indicate one contactor is harder to pull in than the other.  

Simplest solution is to put the contactor control power on a separate UPS system to isolate it from the line voltage.  This would be easy to test to see if a separate source of 120V solves the problem.  

I don't think the problem is in the motor.

You might need to get a EE out there to see what is going on.  

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Hi Munequip,

I see this a lot. You would also end up with the second pump
chattering after the generator is loaded with the first even worse.

dpc is correct about UPSing the contactors.

I believe the best solution though is to put soft starters in.  They aren't very expensive and you would never shock load your generators again.  They limit the motor starting current to whatever you set them at (within reason).

We had the same problem when a compressor started.  All sorts of controls would drop out due to the sudden brief voltage sag.

Very annoying when the VCR spits out its tape.. :) Anyway the S.S. toally cured all the problems.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

I agree with itsmked, solid state soft starters are the simplest readilly available solution.

That said, there is something in your post that bothers me a little.

Quote:

The submersible pump manufacturer states that the inrush current is with in an acceptable limit of 10 to 15 times FLA.
10x to 15x is an acceptable limit? These had better be some really good energy efficient motor designs, because that is NOT generally considered acceptable, should be closer to 6X FLA for a design B motor. And why would someone use a high efficiency motor on a short duty cycle application like a sewage lift station anyway? You are asking for trouble IMHO.
Be that as it may, you already have the motors and now need to deal with the issue. Add a couple of simple retrofit soft starters.

Side issue for your future reference: you mentioned changing out the control transformer twice. If you did not use a 'control power transformer', that can be a problem, because standard distribution transformers are not specifically designed to handle the inrush transient of an AC coil as CPTs are. That means you must use a much larger transformer to avoid voltage drop. In this case however, a 5kVA transformer for 2 x 30HP contactors was serious enough overkill to make up for that.

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."   
Nikola Tesla

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Many soft starters monitor the frequency of the incoming supply and will trip if that goes outside of the manufacturers specified range. They are therefore not always the best proposition for starting loads fed from a generator.

As the load come on the prime mover of the generator may slow down which in turn reduces the generators output frequency. If the alternator section does not have a sufficient overload capacity or the governor does not act to increase fuel supply to the prime mover quickly and smootly enough, there is a possibility that the soft starter will see an 'out of frequency range' condition and trip accordingly.

Most soft starters have a frequency tolerance of +/- 3Hz, some +/- 10Hz, others disregard frequency altogether once they enter start mode.

As indicated by others above, the contactor chatter issue would normally be voltage related. A soft starter may act to minimise voltage disturbance, but may trip if the generator is undersized or poorly maintained.

Regards,
GGOSS

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Yow GGOSS you are absolutely correct!  I had that same problem once... Had to then change the governor to a fast one...

Munequip do look for the widest freq soft starter u can find if you go that route.

I wish the S.S. makers would get their heads outta the sand on that one.



RE: Motor starting current and genset size

itsmoked,

Some of them have got their heads outta the sand, but as there is no room for commercial stuff here, I will refrain from mentioning names.

One other possible solution for Munequip is to change the AVR (automatic voltage regulator). To assess the possibility for improved performance (better voltage regulation), discussions should be had with the manufacturer of the gen-set.

Regards,
GGOSS

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

My two cents:

Most of above repsonses are good..for cost and ease to implementation, try this:

1. Provide a separate source of control power, like dpc said, via small UPS fed by the gen power. UPS battery will hold the power for 10 seconds. This appears to be cheapest.

2. Fit the generator with a digital voltage regulator, for faster response.

3. Add capacitor to the motor, to bring starting current down and hence the voltage drop.

4. Use soft starter...best but most expensive..

5. See if you can find a motor starter coil (contactor) which work on lower voltage..that is one with a wider range of voltage..



RE: Motor starting current and genset size

If your generator cannot handle the starters, then it cannot handle the motors.  It is possible that phasor voltage difference between the source and the motor is greater than if the motor is stopped.

Why does it matter whether the coils are held in during a changeover?

Why don't you put a delay in your ATS so that the motors can spin down and the generator can spin up?

Then you can bring them back up on soft starts.  Your 100 kVA generator ought to do OK as long as it doesn't have to deal with a motor inrush.

William

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

What i meant in my last post is that try the soultions in that sequence and stop where it works.

weh3:

you are not reading the question right, its not during the change over..I think OP is talking about starting motors from standstill but fed from the generator. Coils are chattering during the start..not during the change over..there is no mention of ATS in the question.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

(OP)
rbulsara is correct in that the problem occurs when starting the motors from a standstill and the power is being supply by the genset.

The genset manufacturer has been to the site on several occasions, and to date, have been very repsonsive.  Unfotunately, they have changed most of the items that are easilly changed, and adjusted the voltage, and the problem still occurs.  They have now stated that there is nothing they can do, and that the genset is sized properly for the load, so it must be a problem in the motors.

The motor manufacturer states that they do not have a prbome in the motor.  So we are in the middle trying to figure out a resolution.

As for the comment from jraef regarding the current, it is my understanding that there are three "levels" (simply term from a Civil Engineer) for the current.  The full load current of the motor, the starting current of the motor (which is ~ 6x FLA), and the in rush current of the motor (which is 10 to 15x the FLA depending on which reference item is used).

Any clarification to this item would also be appreciate.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

starting current is same as the inrush current. The maximum inrush or starting current will be equal to the LRA (locked rotor current). 6x FLA is most common value. 7X at the most.

If you have a motor with LRA of 10 or 15 times the FLA, that will be very unusual. So it is possible that you have very different motor than other installations.

The motor should have a code letter (not the insulation level) like G or H on its nameplate. NEC has the multipier assigned to those code letter which will give you maximum kVA or LRA. If you use that multipier with the FLA you get the LRA.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

GGOSS; What S.S. maker makes an S.S. that either doesn't care about incoming frequency or allows the greatest diviation?

I have no idea why they all insist on providing frequency diviation detection functions with softstart.  It's rather like going to the auto dealer and finding every vehicle comes with an anchor on fifty feet of chain.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

A couple of comments on motor starting current:

Submersible motors are notorious for having high inrush, low power factors, low efficiency, and all sorts of other unusual "features".  These motor generally do not have to comply with NEMA MG-1.  

It is important to distinguish between locked rotor current and transient inrush current.  They are related but not the same.  Locked rotor current is the steady-state symmetrical ac current drawn during locked-rotor conditions.   Transient inrush current is the total asymmetrical current drawn at the instant the motor is energized and can include a significant dc transient component in addition to the symmetrical locked rotor current.  The 10x to 15x value is probably the transient inrush current including the worst-case dc offset which is a function of the motor X/R ratio and the source voltage phase angle when energizing.  10x doesn't sound high at all for this value.  

15x is high for a general-purpose motor, but maybe not for a submersible motor.

I agree that a solid-state reduced-voltage starter is an option, but there can be interaction with the generator during starting since the solid-state starter is a potent source of harmonics during starting.  

 

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

WARNING! TANGENTIAL DISCUSSION!

Quote:

I have no idea why they all insist on providing frequency diviation detection functions with softstart.
I'll butt in here. "They" don't all need to do this, but many do as GGOSS pointed out. That is mainly because of their phase angle sensing circuit. In order to know when to fire the SCRs within the phase angle, you need to know what it is to begin with. You can't measure zero, so you look at the cross over point between two phases, i.e. where the 1/2 wave voltage of A-C falling = B-C rising.
A common and inexpensive sensing system looks at just one cross-over point and determines (through timing) the firing point of all six SCRs from that one point in a phase-locked-loop circuit. This works absolutely fine on utility power, but if your frequency starts drifting out of range, this timing system gets messed up and begins firing the SCRs at the wrong time.

The first design to use this system came out of the South African minig industry years ago, and they were very successfull all over the world because they were simple and inexpensive. Their success created several spinoffs and copycats. Some of those spinoffs got bought up by other larger companies in the industry consolidation that happened a decade or so ago. Unfortunately all carried with them the same basic flaw, leading to a rash of soft starters that had problems running behind generators. Ahhh... the pitfalls of reverse engineering or buying your way into a technology!

A few manufacturers have fixed this problem, but because it involves adding to the component count many have not bothered, chosing instead to just shut the starter down whenever the frequency drifts too far.

There are however other firing angle sensing methods out there that started earlier or later than that one, and spinoffs or copycats of those systems don't have that same problem.

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."   
Nikola Tesla

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

I see... Thanks for the history lesson.  I do fully understand the basic functioning of the SS.  If I was building one it would seem easy to base the coming cycle's control on the present zero crossing without bothering to look at the actual frequency. It just seems so logical to use SSs on generators, specifically to allow smaller more efficeint generators start larger motors.  sigh...

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Rbulsara - most High Efficiency motors will have a Locked Rotor Current of greater than 7.5 x FLC. I have just completed a start performance appraisal for a customer, his motor had an LRC of 8.7 x FLC. I have also experienced motors with LRC values of up to 11 x FLC.

In addition most HF motors will have an LRT value of around 120 - 140%. That means elevated starting currents; even under reduced voltage conditions, which of-course makes it all the more difficult to start machines that are gen-set supplied.

It is far less common these days to find a motor with an LRC value of less than say 6.5 x FLC than it was 5 years ago.

Itsmoked - I won't post manufacturers names here, just not comfortable in doing that. I can give you a tip however. All soft starters will measure frequency at the pre-start phase of operation and it must be within specified range during that time. Most lock into that during the  soft start, run and soft stopping phases of operation and any drift beyond specified range will result a trip condition. There are some soft starters on the market that provide a frequency tolerance during soft starting and soft stopping that is wider than the frequency tolerance during pre-start and run phases of operation. There are some soft starters that ignore frequency or dynamically recalibrate themselves during the soft starting and soft stopping phases and those (to my way of thinking) provide real advantages in gen-set supplied installations. As stated above I will not mention names here, but with this information available to you, you you are now armed to ask all the 'right' questions of your soft start suppliers.

jraef - good input as usual. When purchasing soft starters it's certainly a case of you get what you pay for.

Regards,
GGOSS.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

I'm a bit surprised that no-one has suggested the trusty Autotransformer starter?  It has the added advantage of the transformer effect (ie. VA in = VA out), and it will not trip on any supply frequency issues.

An Autotransformer starter will (generally) provide more torque at lower current than an Electronic Soft Starter will.


Sometimes, simple is best!

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

DoggyDog,
You are correct in theory, however look again at the HP size. 28HP at 460V? I challenge you to find an RVAT starter that small, and in the larger sizes where they are available, solid state soft starters have been less expensive for years now.

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at FAQ731-376  
Member, P3

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Howdy DoggyDog,

I don't dispute what you say about auto-trannys at all, in fact I have often offered them in lieu of soft starters. However the advantages they present (in terms of further reducing in line current draw) are limited to what I refer to as being 'light load' applications.

Take for example that we have an auto-tranformer starter with standard tappings of 50, 65 & 80%, a motor with an LRC of 6 x FLC and a load that requires 25% torque (very rare)to achieve rated speed. The line current draw will be; 3 x FLC with a soft starter, you could use the 50% tapping on the transofrmer and this would give a line current draw of 1.5 x FLC not taking into consideration transformer losses of-course

If we now consider at a load that requires say 49% start torque, the line current draw will be; 4.2 x FLC with a soft starter, the 65% tapping on the transformer could be selected however as this will not allow the motor to achieve full speed before the transition to full voltage, when the trnasition occurs you can expect the a line current draw somewhere between 2.5 to 6 x FLC. Alternativelt you could select the 80% tapping which would give a line draw of 3.84 x FLC excluding transformer losses.

From the above you will note that the difference in line current draw via a soft starter or auto-transformer starter are similar for heavier applications. The advantage that the soft starter provides is that you can program things like current ramp starts (low initial current setting ramping to maximum current setting) which basically gives the governor in a gen-set more time to respond to the changing load condition thereby providing better overall performance.

The other significant point to note is that the transformer will provide a reduced start torque right throughout the acceleration period. With the right soft starter (closed loop controlled current), the available motor torque increases as the motor approaches rated speed making it a far better option for starting difficult loads.

So in short, an auto-transformer starter can reduce the starting current to levels below that of a soft starter in some applications. There are however several limitations as noted above.

Regards,
GGOSS

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Well stated GGOSS.

Yasas!

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at FAQ731-376  
Member, P3

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Quote:

I have no idea why they all insist on providing frequency diviation detection functions with softstart.

Lets put it in the simplest terms. You need to time between zero crossings to calculate the line period. Then, you need to figure out where in the cycle you want to fire the SCR and time from the zero crossing to the firing point. Using analog circuits or a processor you'll always end up with some limits on the range of timing you can use. Since you have limits on the timing range you also have limits on the operating frequency range.

Quote:

The other significant point to note is that the transformer will provide a reduced start torque right throughout the acceleration period. With the right soft starter (closed loop controlled current), the available motor torque increases as the motor approaches rated speed making it a far better option for starting difficult loads.

This is where the big advantage goes to a soft-starter. A pump follows a squared load function, ie the load increases by the square of the speed increase. So, as you accelerate the motor you need more and more torque. Using a soft-starter you can ramp up the torque output to better match the pump load requirements.

I've been involved in applying soft-starters on many generator/pump applications and you've got lots of generator for those two pumps. We've even developed software to control the power instead of the current since a generator is more affected by power drawn then kVA drawn. Using tricks like this has allowed us to start motors on generators down to a 1:1 kW rating ratio. We like to see the generator sized >=1.5x the motor though.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

I have some thoughts based on 4 years operating electrical generation and distribution on submarine (turbo DC and AC motor and diesel driven alternators / generators)

1.  When the transfer switch switches how is load picked up engine NOTE I did not say alternator - on purpose
2.  How large is that load?  
Each of these 20 KW motors starting load is 120 KW.  You said the genset was 80 (??).  I think you would grunt to at 50% overload.
3.  You make no mention of what frequency (engine speed) does on starting these loads.
4.  The engine just may not be able to handle the load you are imposing on it.  IT CANNOT START EVERYTHING AT ONCE
5.  What is switch over time on transfer switch?  How long does it take to get engine up to speed.
6.  You have to be smart and selective when loading down any generator.
7.  All you have been doing is what is called "Easter Egging" in the Navy -- you are guessing and throwing parts at the problem.

Put some CTs in there and a frequency detector and use a high speed data logger to record at intervals of 1 to 5 msec(current voltage frquency) what is happening.

If these two pumps are the largest load I would start them first then start everything else.  This is called selective loading.  

Dan Bentler

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

One other thing I forgot to mention.
If engine speed drops too low then voltage WILL drop no matter how good the voltage regulator is.

We started 75 KW feed pump on 250 KW -- 250 VDC diesel gen.  The first time we tried it the engine just shut down.  We first thought we had stalled it.  What we found out there was a solenoid in the governer fed from 250 VDC.  Voltage dropped when starting the feed pump of course,
the solenoid dropped out, the governor "dropped out" and the engine stopped.  We used the manual override on the governor when starting feed pumps on the diesel - worked fine.

I believe your genset is just fine, the motors are just fine, you just have a problem in how you are loading the engine.

Change your loading sequence.
OR
use soft starts
OR
use VFDs which may also give you a dollar returne by saving energy when you don't have to run both pumps at full speed.

Dan Bentler

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Munequip:

I identify two problems in your application:

1- Your submersible pump motors have very high inrush current, 13 times the full load current. For 420 amperes measured while starting on the utility line, the power demand at 480 volts is:     kVA i = 1.732*480*420/1000 = 349.2
The first motor load, kVAm = 1.732*480*32.3/1000 =26.85, adds to the inrush load.
When the second motor starts the demand is 376 kVA with low power factor.

2- The generator is to small and possible “Stand- By type”
On average a maximum current of 3 times the generator full load current is allowed for 10 seconds before thermal damage is developed to the generator windings. Assuming the generator has 0.8 power factor your max current is 376/100 = 3.76 times the full load current. That is above the safety limits and the expected voltage drop is higher than normal.

Probably that generator is good to start two 28.2 HP motors but “Nema design B type” with 6 to 6.5 times inrush current, but not the extremely high inrush submersible pump motors.
Since 13 times Ifl is twice the 6.5 normal inrush current, I guess you need around a 200 kVA Generator to minimize the voltage drop and prevent damage to the generator.

I wonder if the pumps will start with reduced torque, so the recommended inrush reductions of different types could work, other way the generator size has to be increased.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

My interpretation of his "10 to 15 times FLA" statement about inrush as being his meter picking up the true inrush, or magnetizing current, of the motor as opposed to his Locked Rotor Amps, and that only lasts a couple of cycles. He likely had his Fluke set for Peak reading, and the reading rate was set so high that it picked up and recorded magnetizing current.

Whenever I see odd HP sizes like that in the US on submersible lift station pumps, 9 times out of 10 it is a Flygt pump. They use their own custom motor, but it has a Design B torque/speed curve for the most part. LRA is 6x FLA, nothing special.

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at FAQ731-376  
Member, P3

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

My suggestion is to make simple modification initially which is easier to do instead major change in the starter.  Just service the existing contactor.  I give my experiences on contactors:

1. I encountered some large contactors chattering upon closing for a few seconds.  We opened up the contactors and cleaned the internals.  The chattering noise disappeared.

2. We are using UK voltage (415V) and contactor coil is supposed to be 240V.  But in our market here, 220V coil is very popular and by strictly complying to nominal voltage of 240V it will means special order and long delivery time.  However, use of 220V coil makes us happier since the drop-off voltage is generally lower, around 45% - 65%.  For more than 10years of use of 220V coils(we have a few hundred LV motors) on 240V source, we haven't encounter any failure.

Try the above 2 simple approach first before you attempt on more complicated solutions.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

jraef,
Being less expensive and actually working are two different things!  This is eng-tips not sales-tips!  By drawing less current, there will be less loading on the alternator and prime mover = closer to rated voltage and frequency.  BTW, Autotransformer starters are available at this power.

GGOSS,
I agree with your statement completely.  Your calculations also prove my point (more succinctly than I could ever do!).  Would you also agree that a submersible pump is considered a 'light load' application?

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Perhaps you may want to ask how do I know our contactor coils' drop-off voltage is around 45..65%.

Voltage sag/dips is something that we cannot avoid.  We have transient disturbance recorder installed at our infeed station, therefore we know how bad are the voltage dips.

When there is a voltage dip, and some motors drop off line, we will investigate the contactors' drop-off voltage by use of a single-phase variac.  We will improve it by cleaning the contactor internal components or just replace the whole contactor.

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

I disagree that the UPS is the best solution to the problem based off maintenance requirements of the UPS itself.

A constant voltage transformer is more suited for this application and can hold the voltage to 90% rated output with 70% nominal input voltage continuously at full load.  They can ride through 3ms at zero input voltage.  They work even better at lesser loads or if oversized.

The CVT's also require no periodic maintenance and are suitable for the same hot environment outdoor motor starters are usually in.  

For a starting point, check out the Sola-Hevi duty MCR and CVS series.  I think they patented or invented the CVT?

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

DoggyDog,
So you are saying that RVSS starters don't work? You are entitled to your opinion, but I beg to differ. Also, I found only one price shown on-line for RVAT starters that small, and it was almost 4 times the average RVSS price of equal rating, US$2,500 vs US$650. Even if that price was off by a factor of 2, twice the price is still a LOT more expensive, not a little. So I guess if you HAD to waste money based on fear of electronics, at least do it grandly, or "2 grand"-ly as this case may be.

"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at FAQ731-376  
Member, P3

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Hello Doggydog

Having been actively involved in the industry for many years, I can confirm that while auto transformer certainly can be used as starters of induction motor, and that the line current is reduced by the transformer action such that the line current drops by the square of the voltage relative to the full voltage starting current, there are many circumstances where the benefit of this action becomes masked by the constant voltage torque curves.

There are a number of different types of starter available and all yeild different charascteristics.
The star delta and auto transformer starters are constant voltage. The reduced voltage start torque curve is equal to the full voltage start torque curve multiplied by the square of the voltage reduction ratio over the entire speed range. The load curve often follows a square law curve and is low torque at low speed but rises rapidly as the motor approaches full speed.
If you take a set of motor speed torque curves and then plot the 50% tap curve against the start torque curve for a pump, you will usually find that the motor does not have sufficient torque to accelerate the motor to full speed.

I have posted some example curves to http://www.LMPhotonics.com/start_curves/start_curves.htm
These clearly show that the autotransformer in these cases is not superior to the soft starter in reducing the line current. There are certainly situations where the auto transformer does provide a lower line current, but there are many that do not. The best applications for the autotransformer to provide a superior line current during start, are primarily inertial loads where there is little work current requirement.
One of the problems with the AT starter on gensets is that it increases the KW loading on the engine more than a soft starter does due to the power dissipated in the transformer.

Best regards,

Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Marke,

Good post as normal, but the last line

Quote:

One of the problems with the AT starter on gensets is that it increases the KW loading on the engine more than a soft starter does due to the power dissipated in the transformer.
puzzles me. Are you talking about the small losses due to I2R in the windings and the magnetising losses in the transformer? I'm surprised that they are larger than the VF.I and switching losses in the solid-state switches of the electronic unit. The benefits of the solid-state starter are many, but this seems a very marginal one!

----------------------------------

One day my ship will come in.
But with my luck, I'll be at the airport!

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Hi ScottyUK

There are reasonably high losses in the autotransformer during start. They are intermittently rated with a limited number of starts per hour. The losses of the soft starter are definitely lower at around 4 watts per amp.
The primary resistance starter is probably the worst starter to use on a gen set due to the very high KW losses in the resistors which really load up the engine.

Best regards,

Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com

RE: Motor starting current and genset size

Aolalde is correct starting KVA with those motors is to much for a 80 KVA genset. Volt drop is greater then normal design causing contactor coil field to colapse most likely. Good design would suggest different way of starting, differnt pump or bigger generator. However if motors start with ups, CVT or other method suppling contactor coil see how long everything last you might luck out depending on outages.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources