×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

how to design a beam modelled as shell elements

how to design a beam modelled as shell elements

how to design a beam modelled as shell elements

(OP)
Hi everybody,
the statement of the problem:
cut and cover metro station (3.5m below the ground level)
top and bottom slabs are 90cm thick, outer shear walls are 70cm thick, inner shear walls are 30cm thick. dimensions are approx. 26m x 23m from axis to axis (1 part of a total station) It has been modelled by using shell elements. Due to geometry, an approx. 10.5m span length has to be passed by a beam of 170cm height. Beam has also been modelled as shell element.
the designer's approach:
the designer has tabulated F11 forces, found (or assumed- not clear from the report)neutral axis, took moments of F11's with respect to neutral axis, found moments and calculated the reinforcements.
my approach:
Tabulate stresses(sigma's), plot against the height of the beam, locate the neutral axis, calculate forces, and so on. I also suggested to the designer, model the beam as frame element but the designer claimed that due to the thickness of the top slab (90cm), it could not be connected (shell to frame) properly.
The question is what is the usual or practical way of designing such beams?
Thanks in advance.    

RE: how to design a beam modelled as shell elements

If you were using ETABS, I'd say to call the desired shell a "spandrel" which will give you the forces that you need to design it as a beam. I'm not sure if this is possible in SAP.

I don't really like the stress summation idea because I've seen really weird results from this in the past. Most people are simply not FE experts enough to do this without screwing something up.

Using good modeling techniques, there's no reason it can't be a frame element. Look at it like a tee-beam and calculate A, I, etc. Then the effective concrete width must be subtraced away from I to keep from double-dipping. This is what I'd do.

DBD

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources