Crack control of cooling tower basin
Crack control of cooling tower basin
(OP)
I’m engaging in an interesting structural design – a cast in place concrete basin on steel frame (I posted a couple of threads for the same structure). The basin is about 200ft x 50ft base area to contain water (7ft deep) and support cooling tower (timber structure). The basin will be casted on steel frames since the site is in a slope and it is required to be elevated, the steel columns will be about 25ft tall at the deep end. Steel deck will be used as bottom board. The preliminary design shows 12” concrete on 3” deck is proper from structural consideration. Now comes the joint design. Based on previous experience and literature study, one or two expansion joints with heavy reinforcement to waive control joints seems proper. I’d ask your opinion about this.
Another question is: What about prestress? For the whole basin slab I don’t see big horizontal restraint by adjoining structural components, and the tower support structure is independent to others. With prestress (mid height post-tensioning or something alike) I’ll be more confident to remove the expansion joints.
Thanks for input!
Another question is: What about prestress? For the whole basin slab I don’t see big horizontal restraint by adjoining structural components, and the tower support structure is independent to others. With prestress (mid height post-tensioning or something alike) I’ll be more confident to remove the expansion joints.
Thanks for input!






RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
1. Staged placement of concrete in 50' to 100' segments with construction joints would be a good possibility - with waterstops in the joints along with a good sealant at the joint.
2. I have used shrinkage resistant concrete before in cooling tower basins to minimize shrinkage with limited success - you have to get the reinforcing amount just right for it to work well.
3. I would think that expansion joints would be a future maintenance problem - not sure you need them for a 200 ft. basin - also - they would break up any diaphragm action you might need for lateral forces.
4. Use of silica fume would densify the mix and help make the concrete more impermeable - unless you plan to coat the thing and then it would just serve as a backup to the coating.
just a few ideas.
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
www.SlideRuleEra.net
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
RE: Crack control of cooling tower basin
If the concrete slab is casted monolithically up to 200ft. Do you think that the support deck is a serious restraint of concrete shrinkage? Should this be a concern and be analyzed somehow?
Having the metal deck support continuously up to 200ft with shear studs to the support beams, I can see it is a kind of shrinkage restraint, particularly in the flute direction. As per ACI, concrete drying shrinkage strain is about 600E-6, this means the total free shrinkage is 1.44 inch