×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

No Epansion joints

No Epansion joints

No Epansion joints

(OP)
Future project to build 1000 ft x 300ft x 10inch thick structural slab supported on 2000 piles. ACI recommendation is to place expansion joints every 200ft - 250 ft. Can we build the slab without Expansion joints but with several Construction joints which contain shear keys and rebars across, and  with controllable pour sizes and checkerboard pour system, with 14 days time delay between adjacent pours, without experiencing significant shrinkage cracks???????????

Allan

RE: No Epansion joints

Feasible to some extent should be since airports (thicker slabs) longer than that are built.

The target is to force adequate separation between cracks and their size.

Give a look to the publication + software

Design of Continuously Reinforced Concrete pavement ofr AIrports

CRC-AIRPAVE

Sold as a unit by CRSI.

(There's other for Highways CRC-Highway Pave)

In any case, the checker boarding may be is not as good idea this time since the built units could act as prefixed joints to be later apparent.

RE: No Epansion joints

I would also suggest looking into details of concrete placement/sequencing for large 'superflat' industrial slabs.

My own experience is that long and narrow slabs will perform better than a 'checkerboard' placement pattern. I strongly recommend the careful reading of ACI 360R-92(97) (Guide for Design of Slabs on Grade), Note Chapter 9, Reducing the effects of Slab Shrinkage and Curling.

I tend to discourage 'rebars' crossing the joints as I have seen significant cracking (parallel to and 2' to 4' away from the joint) of the old and new slabs due to restraint of the shrinkage of the adjoining slabs. I usually prefer proper dowelling to allow shrinkage movement but, your application may not allow such. The 14 days (or more) delay between adjoining pours is good and may be sufficient to minimize craking to an acceptable amount.

RE: No Epansion joints

Agree with ishvaag and emmgjld....
Keep in mind that concrete is rarely any larger (volumetrically) than immediately after placement.  Rarely is there a need for true "expansion" joints.  Total shrinkage in concrete is almost always greater than any thermal or moisture expansion potential.

You don't give your location, but there are a few area where environmental conditions coupled with placement conditions can give you a problem.  An example is placement of the concrete at relatively low temperatures (40F or so), then getting high temps of greater than 100-110F on the concrete itself at some time later.  This can cause problems in long, narrow strip placements.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources