×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Deck vs. balcony live loads

Deck vs. balcony live loads

Deck vs. balcony live loads

(OP)
After all the confusion about definition of "deck" versus "balcony" that endured for years under the UBC codes, the IBC supposedly cleared this up. This relates to residential and multi-family construction.

Looking at 2003 IBC Table 1607.1 (2000 IBC is similar),an exterior balcony gets a live load of 100 psf, with the exception of one or two-family residences only, not exceeding 100 sq. ft., you may use a live load of 60 psf.

I would think the OPPOSITE would make sense: a smaller balcony would have more of a chance to be crowded with people. Therefore, why isn't the live load 100 psf for 100 sq. ft or less, and 60 psf for greater than 100 sq.ft.?

Now, to make matters more confusing, read the definition of "deck" versus "balcony" - it states that "deck" is supported  on at least 2 opposing sides, i.e., it is not a cantilever affair. Now the since the Code seems to consider this more "fail-safe", it allows live load same as occupancy served (40 psf for residential/multifamily). Now isn't 40 psf unconservative? I would think it should be at least 60 psf, especially for a small deck. You could easily have a party with many people on that deck. Just because it isn't cantilevered, why allow the individual joists or edge beam more of a chance to fail?

To put things in perspective, we did a load study (measured area on floor of people standing close as possible). Assuming everyone told the truth about their weight, it came to about 73 psf.

RE: Deck vs. balcony live loads

We found another distiction between a deck and a balcony. That being, a balcony has a roof covering it. A deck doesn't. So why should the roof induce a larger load on the balcony?

Perhaps it's got something to do with snow. Or with people rushing to the nearest convenient place of shelter in a downpour.

Also, if you consider the decks serve only a basic single family dwelling, and a balcony serving multiple tenants, in that case, the balcony would require the higher live load since it's serves as a collector exit route. At least this seemed to make sense to me.

RE: Deck vs. balcony live loads

(OP)
AlohaBob,
The concept of balcony serving multiple tenants in an apartment structure, as a collector exit route, falls under the classification of "Stairs, corridors, and exit balconies", with a live load of 100 psf. That makes sense. My OP describes what doesn't make sense (at least to me).  

RE: Deck vs. balcony live loads

Sacrebleu....you make some good points. This is a great example of "Engineering Judgement". This is why someone cant just read the code or plug numbers into a program and be an "Engineer". I have no problem using loads larger than the code if I feel they are applicable to the situation.

RE: Deck vs. balcony live loads

Factor in the idiot load coef. for balcony. Check out the collapse of the balcony in Chicago a couple years ago. I don't have a link, sorry.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources