×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

(OP)
I am doing a relatively simple flow analysis on a piping network and I ran into a problem.  The piping network was some quick disconnects that are giving me large minor losses.  For instance, the manufacturers catalog data shows that at 8gpm the qd has a 5psi(guage) pressure drop. From manometry deltaZ=(deltaP/specific weight) right? Using this simple equation should give the equivalent height(or depth if you prefer) of the fluid corresponding to this pressure change.  Also the minor loss of some component could be found by Hm=(K*V^2)/(2*g), where Hm is the head loss. Solving for K gives (2*Hm*g)/V^2. I am after the K value(I am summing all minor losses) but when I substitute in say 8gpm and the 5psi drop, I end up with K being around 45 which seems absurd. I think I am doing this wrong but am not sure.  Any ideas/criticism please let me know.  Thanks

Pipe ID=0.82 in, g=32.174 ft/s^2, V=Q/A=4.86ft/s,specific weight=43.73 lb/ft^3, rho=1.359 slug/ft^3, Re=360 which is <2300 so laminar, if I forgot anything else just ask me.

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

Steve,

I assume your viscosity is 5.99E+01 cp.  Then given the conditions you describe, I estimate the equivalent length of a 5 psi drop is about 17.3 feet of 0.82 pipe or a K value of about 6.4.

Also, are you using psi when you should be using psf?

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

(OP)
Actually the viscosity is 5.99E+01 cp and I am using psf, I even went back to check in case I thought one thing and wrote another, but it is in psf (5psi *144=720psf).  How did you come about with your value for K?

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

If you have a pipe flow calculator, Set Q, D, P1, and P2.... solve for L.  That's your equiv L for the given D.
K can be gotten from the relation L/D = K/ft, where ft is the fully turbulent flow friction factor, L is the equiv L and D is the pipe dia(in L units.)

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

Coming out of those awful units:
V=15.9 m/s
ρ=700 kg/m3
velocity head H=ρV2/2=88000 Pa = 0.88 bar = 13 psi
K=5/13=0.4

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

Steve,

The short answer is that you are spot on with your calcs. It is a long time since I tried to work in pounds force per square foot and slugs per cubic foot! Thank goodness for the SI system. I agree with prex that the old units were awful (NB prex, 4.86 ft/s is 1.48 m/s and not 15.9 m/s).

The reason for your seemingly high K value is the low Reynolds number.  Compilations of K values should always include the warning that they apply to turbulent flow only. In turbulent flow the K value of a fitting is more-or-less independent of the Reynolds number, but the K value of a given fitting increases as the Reynolds number decreases below 2300.  Hooper introduced the 2-K method and later Darby extended it to the 3-K method in an effort to take changing diameter and Reynolds number into account. These concepts are discussed at http://www.cheresources.com/eqlength.shtml

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

(OP)
Thanks everyone for the help.  RGasEng, I was going to solve for L but I don't believe I can use the fully turbulent friction factor because my flow never goes turbulent, or even close.  The link katmar posted was very helpful. I know the units are awful but I am using a spreadsheet that was made by another engineer here and he loves english units. I am going to take what ya'll [I'm from Texas;)] have given me and work on this some more. Thanks again for the help.    

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

katmar:
Such an astute observation deserves more than one star.  Good link.  Do you have a copy of the Hooper paper that you can make available?

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

I once heard a lawyer say that the English lawyers are the best in the world. They have to be because the English law is so complicated.  Perhaps an engineer who understands formulas expressed in English units is also world class, even if he is a Texan!

RE: K value for a double shutoff quick disconnect.

RGasEng,

I think there would be copyright issues preventing me distributing copies of this article. If you cannot get to a university library yourself I would think that you could request a copy of the article via your local library. The reference was in the link I gave previously

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources