×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UBC 1991 seismic loads

UBC 1991 seismic loads

UBC 1991 seismic loads

(OP)
I assume that the seismic load calculated by equation 34-1 in section 2334 is an "utimate load"?  The reason I think this is because in section 2338 for non-building structures, it states specifically that "the minimum design lateral forces in this section are at a service level (rather than yield or ultimate level)". They don't make such a statement in section 2334.

RE: UBC 1991 seismic loads

I believe that the 1991 UBC is a service level seismic load system.  In the 1997 UBC they switched to an ultimate load level for seismic.

The base shear given in equation 34-1 is then used in the load combinations of 2303 where no factored load combinations are offered.

RE: UBC 1991 seismic loads

JAE is right.  It is at service level.  At 1991, there was no such thing called near source factors.  As a comparison, you can take the equation 30-5 in the 1997 UBC, assuming Na = 1, then divide by 1.4, you will find that the value will be comparable to one using equation 34-1.

RE: UBC 1991 seismic loads

(OP)
I'm having trouble proving to myself that the 1997 UBC eq 30-5 value divided by 1.4 is comparable with 1991 UBC eq 34-1 value as suggeted by whyun.  I seem to get a much higher value from UBC 1997 /1.4 with all other input data similar.

RE: UBC 1991 seismic loads

Try an example, say light framed plywood shear wall structure, standard soil and importance factor of 1.0 in seismic zone 4.

Using the 1991 UBC, ZIC/Rw
Z = 0.4
I = 1.0
C = use 2.75
Rw = 8

Base shear V is 0.1375

Now try the 1997 UBC, 2.5 Ca I / R
Ca = 0.44Na = 0.44 (assuming type Sd soil and Na = 1.0)
R = 5.5

Base shear is 0.2 but this is at ultimate.
0.2/1.4 gives 0.1428 at allowable level.

Both codes gave similar results at around 0.14.  You may want to try using different lateral systems with different Rw and R values.  Result should be comparable.

1997 Code introduced the near source factors to penalize you if the building is near a seismic source.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources