×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

(OP)
From the Salmon and Johnson 4th edition steel book, it appears to me that, basically, a fully composite steel beam has a sufficient horizontal shear capacity from its shear studs between the point of zero moment and max moment to pick up the ENTIRE compressive force component of the couple @ max moment, while a partially composite steel beam has enough studs to only pick up a PORTION of this compressive force.

So.....my question is, why would you ever go with partially composite instead of fully composite?  To save # of studs?  It just seems inefficient, because then your beam size and slab thickness may be bigger if you go partial instead of fully composite...

Thanks.

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

Most commercial construction is designed for partial composite. We design only for the required loading and not the full section capacity. The savings will be in the number of studs required.

The slab thickness is determined by the span and gravity loading of the slab, not by the composite beam section. The beam size for partial composite is generally the same as you would use for full composite, it just has less studs.

I hope this helps!

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

To add to jike's reply: slab thickness may be controlled by fire rating required.

Just like non-composite beams, long span composite members may be controlled by deflection criteria and not the percent composite action.

Typical range of composite I've seen is 25% to 80%.

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

whyun is 100 % correct. Firerating often controls slab thickness in commercial buildings. Thanks for the backup!

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

Agree with all responses...the maximum lower limit of 25% is recommended by AISC mainly due the the fact that at this low a limit the amount that the shear studs are required to deform is quite high at ultimate load and can result in brittle type failures.  A lower limit of approximately 50% composite is more reasonable.  Generally imposing this lower limit results in a fairly large reserve capacity (for the beam at least - not the connection of course) for a minimum increase in studs (which are cheap).  

Another consideration is that you are typically welding the deck at each flute anyway so you might as well use the labor to shoot a stud in.  

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

(OP)
Thanks...

Finally, can you tell me what page in the code that 25% minimum is written about?  Thanks.

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

It is not explicitly written as a code provision in the 3rd Ed. LRFD (it was in previous editions but has since been removed), but see p16.1-220 "Equations C-I3-6 and C-I3-7 should not be used for ratios [percent composite] less than 0.25.  This restriction is to prevent excessive slip, as well as substantial loss in beam stiffness."  In other words the beam does not act compositely with less than 25% composite action.  Though again I believe 50% is more reasonable.  

RE: Partial vs. Full Composite Steel Construction

Typically we use rules of thumb for filler beam and standard girders(3 or 4 point loads) based on span and serviceability issues so for a typical 30'X30' bay with beams at 8-10' we would use min W16X26. When you run the #'s for full composite it is usually overdesigned so we reduce the number of studs but alwalys keep it at 1 stud per foot.(For composite steel deck) A quick check of the capacity at one stud per foot and it is usually ok. Obviously for conditions other than typical filler beams and girders this dosent apply.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources