Lightning - Motor reversal??
Lightning - Motor reversal??
(OP)
I already have an opinion on this issue, but there are a lot of smart people on this forum with a lot more experience than I will ever have, so I thought that I would ask.
We have an inclined conveyor that failed to hold under load. The conveyor was stopped due to a normal sequence stop. The conveyor ranaway in the reverse direction and did some damage, albeit small in comparison to what could have happened. Fortunately, no one was injured. Yes, as usual, there was a lightning storm in the area.
The conveyor is driven by two 2500 HP, 4160 volt motors and uses across the line, non-reversing starters.
The designer of the conveyor system is claiming that the lightning caused the conveyor motors to reverse and defeat the mechanical rollback devices, allowing the conveyor to accelerate in the reverse direction.
No other motors in the plant (literally hundreds) were affected, and no electrical components of the conveyor system (transformers, cables, surge arrestors, PLC, etc.) were changed after this incident, but he stands by his claim.
My position is that this is impossible, and that there is a deeper mechanical/systems issue to blame for the incident. Bottom line, we do not want a re-occurence, and we must push to identify the actual cause of the problem, regardless who pays. Has anyone ever heard of anything like this happening before?
Thanks,
Raisinbran
We have an inclined conveyor that failed to hold under load. The conveyor was stopped due to a normal sequence stop. The conveyor ranaway in the reverse direction and did some damage, albeit small in comparison to what could have happened. Fortunately, no one was injured. Yes, as usual, there was a lightning storm in the area.
The conveyor is driven by two 2500 HP, 4160 volt motors and uses across the line, non-reversing starters.
The designer of the conveyor system is claiming that the lightning caused the conveyor motors to reverse and defeat the mechanical rollback devices, allowing the conveyor to accelerate in the reverse direction.
No other motors in the plant (literally hundreds) were affected, and no electrical components of the conveyor system (transformers, cables, surge arrestors, PLC, etc.) were changed after this incident, but he stands by his claim.
My position is that this is impossible, and that there is a deeper mechanical/systems issue to blame for the incident. Bottom line, we do not want a re-occurence, and we must push to identify the actual cause of the problem, regardless who pays. Has anyone ever heard of anything like this happening before?
Thanks,
Raisinbran





RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
It is possible that the manufacturer confuses voltage loss and phase reversal (unlikely, but possible). If that is so, an explanation to what MIGHT have happen is given below:
If there are brakes that are activated when the motor voltage is cut off and if these brakes are connected directly to the motor terminals AND if there are PFC capacitors also connected directly to same terminals; then an abnormal power cut (not via control system) MIGHT lead to self-excitation of the motor so that motor voltage keeps brakes open and allows belt to accelerate in wrong direction.
Only if all these rather improbable conditions co-existed AND your mechanical safety device failed, would your belt run backwards. But not in any other case.
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Seriously though, skogsgurra has made a valid point about the remote possibility of the lightning causing some other sort of failure in the system and backup systems (if any), but there is no way on this planet that lightning can make an AC motor run in reverse.
First off, lightning is DC not AC, so even if the lightning directly hit the motor leads (and miraculously somehow did not vaporize them), the worst it could do is lock up the motor, similar to applying a DC injection brake. People see a lot of strange things result from lightning strikes, but in all cases they follow the laws of physics. We think of them as strange only because they are outside the realm of our experience. Changing lightning's nature from DC to 3 phase AC power is as close to impossible as you can find in science!
I know that it is technically debatable that lightning is DC, but it is definitely not 3 phase AC. Even if you stretch the definition of AC to include a variable pulse in one direction (see link below), it still could NEVER be 3 phase because you would need to have 6 precisely times pulses in opposite directions with each pair being 120 deg's apart, and do it precisely that way repeatedly for long enough to create a field in the motor that would cause it to reverse. And all this without damaging the motor or power supply components!
Second, if a nearby lightning hit were to cause some sort of control system malfunction, you would STILL need to have a reversing motor starter for this to cause the motor to change direction. As PWR said, the only thing that can make an AC motor revers direction is to change the phase rotation.
3rd, if it did something at the power generation end of your power supply to cause the phase rotation to reverse, ALL of your AC motors would have reversed.
That guy should go into law or politics. Obfuscation and denial are typical tricks of those professions.
Lightning AC or DC debate link (for the termially curious like me): http://ww
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Yes, you are right, although with the size of conveyor raisinbran is refering to (5000HP), a ratchet would be a noisy device! There are however supposed to be back-spin preventors of some sort, and I think raisinbran was trying to prove the point that whomever supplied this system was deficient in that aspect. The system supplier on the other hand has tried to foist this "devine intervention" excuse instead.
Raisinbran, you sure have some interesting large conveyor applications thread237-124926. What are you mining?
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
I work for a coal mining company, and the sizes of conveyors that I have written about are "typical" for the industry.
Skogsgurra,
There are no electrical brakes on this installation, but most conveyors that I have seen do not rely on electrical brakes.
The only rollback protection provided are mechanical rollbacks (sometimes referred to as backstops or roll back preventers). They are on the high speed side of the gear reducers, which is not typical. Most installations have these protective devices on the low speed side - just incase of a gearing failure.
I thank all of you for your responses.
Regards,
Raisinbran.
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
I wish that it were that simple. When the rollbacks were disassembled, they were in almost brand new condition - no heat, no broken parts, etc. They worked when tested, but they rely on the speed going from + 100 rpm to - 100 rpm (on the high speed side)in a time frame that allows them to react. If you can somehow (and I do not know how) get the system to change direction fast enough, centrifugal force takes over, and you have defeated the devices. Yes, there were two, and we fooled both of them somehow. If we ever get to the bottom of this, I will let you know what we find.
Raisinbran
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
This question is giving me deja vu. I believe this was posted sometime in the past or maybe it is a similar problem?
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Interesting info, thanks. I'll have to remember that when dealing with phase loss protection of screw compressors, but I doubt it is applicable to this specific problem. I can see how a loss of 1 phase would result in a severe loss of torque and allow the motor to be reversed by the load if it was hevy enough. However it cannot reverse any faster than the load can physically reverse it, and in this case he had a mechanical device designed specifically to prevent that. The claim is that somehow the motor reversed FASTER than the load could have done it, thereby defeating the mecahnical device.
I still think the mechanical guy is fishing with the wrong bait.
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
I would think it would be possible for the gearbox to reverse while the motor was still turning forward at a slow speed. It should still take a jam or overload to make the conveyor spring back quick enough to fool the rollbacks.
I don't know how fast you can reverse a 2500 HP motor but I would think you could reverse the gearbox quicker with the fluid coupling "disconnecting" the motor at low RPM.
Barry1961
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
I said even the simplest of ratcheting device should have prevented this problem. Meaning correctly designed and mechanically sound this or these devises whatever they are should not have failed if reversal is evident then the issue is safety and we could have dead employees.
Since machinery powered with electricity can fail for many reasons blown fuse, power surge, there are too many possibilities to list, There for the safety must be designed into the mechanics of moving energy.
My point is clear the design of the conveyor mechanically has much to be desired the engineer behind this design must be incompetent or this would not have been an issue.
You sir may be using the right bait, but your worm is too small!
Chuck
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Small worms must be my problem with fishing too!
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Yup! I was hoping to get a star from Mrs. Jraef...., All
kidding aside I am looking foward to what Rasinbran shakes
out of this and will watch for his post.
Chuck
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Machmech, what was it that I typed that made you engender me as a Mrs.? Let me know so I can avoid that in the future!
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
rmw
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Totally misinterpreted that...
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
We (I) also have concerns about the design and what set of circumstances occurred to allow this to happen. Short term - we have installed a disc brake on the high speed shafting that engaged at zero speed and at any indication of reverse rotation. This is in addition to the high speed roll backs - that were dismantled and examined by the OEM. Long term, we are planning to install low speed roll backs on the drive drum and an additional high speed disc brake on the the other gear case. At that time the existing high speed roll backs will be removed.
Once again, thanks to all for your insight and responses.
Raisinbran
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Side note: When the concrete drum drives snapped, I had to climb into the drums with a jackhammer to clean out the drum. I clearly remember looking at,(and cursing) the sheared off axle with the chain gear mounted on it laying on the ground still engauged in it's worthless chain.
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
These devices are not foolproof which is why you normally use a real brake to keep the load from dropping. However, if lets say that the operating brake is 99.9% reliable and the antirollback clutch is 99.9% reliable then you have more like a 1 in a million chance of failure rather than a 1 in 1 thousand chance of failure. The idea is that redundancy prevents problems particularly if 2 different technologies are extremely unlikely to fail simultaneously.
I still think that this alledged expert is trying to pin the blame on God instead of admitting that he has no idea of what went srong.
In fact, you may never determine what went wrong but you could develop some theories and then investigate as much as you can.
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
These sound like some very good improvements " Necessity is the Mother of invention " I don't know if this would apply in your situation you may want to consider the possibility of Legal responsibility if the system should fail again.
At our company we developed a way to place a hoist on to a machine for lifting rolls, the hoist worked very well and most likely prevented many sore backs how ever a visit from O.S.H.A and we were advised to have each one of our hoist tested by a person certified to do this, then they had to have weight restrictions labels and of course documentation.
I do believe the original manufacturer needs to be taken to the wood shed!
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
Mike Cole's analogy of a seat belt catch raises an interesting point, Is it possible that your high speed antirollback device failed because the belt reversed too slowly?
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more."
Nikola Tesla
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??
With all due respect, let's not make this into a discussion about seat belts.
RE: Lightning - Motor reversal??