×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

use of rigid zone factor

use of rigid zone factor

use of rigid zone factor

(OP)
Hi all!

Well, I have a question:
In some computer programs (SAP, ETABS, RCBE...) the rigid zone factor is set ti 0 (zero) by default. But, when I use this factor as 1 (one) the drifts of the building goes up and the steel reinforcement also goes up a little. Can any one tell me whic factor should I use and in what cases?, I mean, 0 when there is a pinned member as steel structure and 1 when is concrete? OR 0 when the columns and beams are quite equal in sectios and 1 when the columns is more rigid than the beam?, please, help me!

Thanks,

odco

RE: use of rigid zone factor

RAM has the same setup.  I too was wondering what factor to use for what case.  

Hope someone can help . . .

RE: use of rigid zone factor

Per ETABS version 8 Manual:

Rigid-Zone Factor

The rigid-zone factor specifies the fraction of each end offset assumed to be rigid for bending and shear deformations. When a fraction of the end offset is specified as rigid, the outside portion of the end offset is assumed to be rigid; that is, the portion at the end of the frame member. By default, the program assumes the
rigid end factor to be zero; that is, the end offsets are fully flexible and they have the same frame section properties as those assigned to the rest of the member.

The rigid zones of the end offsets never affect axial and torsional deformations. The full element length is always assumed to be flexible for those deformations.

Output forces for the end of a frame member are provided at the inside face of the end offset along the length of the member. No output forces are produced within the end offset.


*** Therefore rigid-zone factor of 1 assumes that the entire member is infinitely rigid and does not allow any rotation at the nodes.

RE: use of rigid zone factor

Typically the Rigid End Zone (REZ)factor of 0 would assume a centerline based model which is typical of most basic analysis and should be accurate enough in general practice.  

Using a REZ of 1.0 assumes there are zero deformations within the area at the intersection of the columns and beams known as the "Panel Zone" (it is infinitely rigid).  The "true" case lies somewhere in between and could be modeled using a rotational spring layouts (e.g. a scissors or krawinkler model) that is beyond the scope of RAM.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources