×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bridge with no bearings!

Bridge with no bearings!

Bridge with no bearings!

(OP)

One of the structures on the contract I’m working on is to be constructed with no bearings. This is the first time I’ve encountered such a structure and was wondering is this normal practice?
The bridge consist of a 50m span deck sitting on an arch profile all cast in-situ and monolithically fix to the abutments.
The abutment themselves are 10m high from soffit to finish road level.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

This is done from time to time. As a bridge contractor in 1977, we constructed a 116 ft. long, three span, highway bridge over a railroad. Each end span is 36 ft. long, the interior span (over the RR track) is 44 ft. The entire deck (all 116 ft.) is monolithic, cast in place concrete. This deck is fixed to all four bents with rebar dowels .

The reason, in this case, was the RR company's concern that a bridge with simple spans could more easily collapse during a train wreck under the bridge. As is typical on bridges over railway lines, both interior bents have substantial concrete collision walls that parallel the tracks.

This seemed unusual to me, too. So I saved the plans - on this occasion don't have to talk from memory, am looking at the plans right now.

www.SlideRuleEra.net

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

Yes, this is fairly typical nowadays and based on what SlideruleEra has noted it's been out there for some time too.

Tenessee is one of the leading DOT's on jointless bridges consequently for smaller structures, they are also bearingless.

MOst other DOT's are following suite and bearings can be expensive.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

Common practice in the UK nowadays.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

(OP)

Then I most ask the question. Why were bearings used in the first place? What has caused such a shift in design?

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

It was easier to calculate non-redundant structures (simply supported) rather than continuous.  The maintenance wasn't seen as such a big problem as now.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

On that last subject, labor was cheap to the DOTs and other agencies.  Maintenance could actually be performed at a reasonable cost...today everything is about lower labor cost and or maintenance costs, if not both.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

Arch bridges have no bearings because they need to be "both-ends-fixed" in order to develop arch action.

Ciao.

RE: Bridge with no bearings!

By making a jointless bridge, you take all your joint trouble and convert it into abutment trouble instead.  It all depends where you find your trouble easiest to deal with.

Hg

Eng-Tips guidelines:  FAQ731-376

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources