×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

No. of Distillation Columns

No. of Distillation Columns

No. of Distillation Columns

(OP)
Hi All,
I have a small question regarding Distillation Column.
Why is 3 distillation column design (for methanol water system) is more energy savings than 2 distillation column design.

Regards

RE: No. of Distillation Columns


I don't know for sure that your statement is right, and would appreciate learning about it from you and other experts.
A known fact, however, is that the relative volatility between methanol and water changes a lot, from 9 at low methanol concentrations to 1.1 at high methanol purities. The latter involves a large number of theoretical trays to achieve methanol separation with water contents in the few ppm range.

RE: No. of Distillation Columns

nomanfahmi:

Regardless of how badly you, I, and the rest of the world want to save or conserve our energy, it does no good if we can't economically justify it.

If 3 distillation columns are better, maybe 4 columns are best.  Who knows?  The point here is that it all depends on the market prices for the methanol, the energy used, the capital cost, the minimum acceptable Capital Recovery factor, etc., etc.  If I'm not mistaken, that should have been one of the basic and primary lessons learned in your university plant design course.

25362 is telling you the same thing I am: there are a lot of factors involved that determined what is the optimum design - the most important probably being the return on the investment.  You can't just generalize a process or design and apply it across the board as a general rule.  Every investment has its story and specific economic background.  We can't judge which is more cost efficient without the details - of which there are many.

RE: No. of Distillation Columns

(OP)
Montemayor

Thats why in my question I mentioned Methanol Synthesis.
For sure I can't generlize what I said of having three columns are more econmical. It is just in methanol synthesis.

RE: No. of Distillation Columns

.
nomanfami:

If you will read page 13 of the .pdf file at the web site address to which you referred us, you will find that Lurgi quite clearly explained why they say that the the three column design uses less energy than the two column design:

Quote:

The distillation principle remains unaffected, but the pure methanol column is divided into two separate columns, one running at elevated pressure, the other at ambient pressure.

Pure methanol is discharged overhead in both columns,
each refining between 40 - 60 % of the product. The
ambient pressure column reboiler utilizes the heat of the
pressure column overhead vapours, which are condensed
simultaneously. This reduces the energy demand for heating
the pure methanol column considerably by approx. 35 %.
I think that, along with the process flow diagram on page 13, the above explanation is quite clear.

Milton Beychok
(Contact me at www.air-dispersion.com)
.

RE: No. of Distillation Columns

(OP)
Thanks for all who answered me,
Actually when I posted my question I also was thinking why in a 2 column system I can't increase the pressure in the first column and use the heat from the 1st column condenser in the 2nd column reboiler.
anyhow I found the answers to all of my questions.
Basically the feed to the distillation unit consist of Methanol, Water , non-condesable gases (mainly CO2),
so the first distillation column is just to take off the non-condesable gasses. the size of the that column will be the same in both designs (2 column or 3). It is also small column , so the reboiler and condenser duties are low. so increasing the pressure in the first column doesn't help because the condenser duty is negligable compared to the 2nd column.
the bottom from the first has methanol and water and can be seprated in one column, but increasing the no of column and adjusting the pressures so the first is the highest will help in utilising the energy.
this thing doesnt depend on methanol price, or the other factor that (Montemayor) mentioned. it only depends on 2 factors capital cost of distillation column and energy price. Therfore it might more economical to have 4 distillation column if the energy price is high

again thanks everybody

RE: No. of Distillation Columns

(OP)
I have another question to the chemical engineers here.

it is regarding the same distillation columns, which is better using the 2nd and 3rd distillation column in series, or dividing the flow to 2 distillation columns and operating one of them at high pressure to take advantage of the heat.
I think by divididng the flow the diameter of the the first distillation column will be less

Thanks

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources