×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Working with FAA budget cutbacks

Working with FAA budget cutbacks

Working with FAA budget cutbacks

(OP)
There has been a number of comments re. the FAA budget cuts.  I wanted to make a couple of comments about my experience with the FAA and may be start some useful conversations about getting the most from the FAA.

I am under the Seattle ACO.  They are suffering like everyone else.  I have found that there are some advantages to gained though.  I resently got FAA PMA.  The MIDO just breezed through everything as they have a budget per company to stick too.  So if everything looks ok, they don't really go digging unless they have good reason.  Also with the ACO, I am a heavy user of the Seattle ACO and I have found they are very open to streamlining programs.  This means I am able to get alot more stuff through at the same same time.  I had a meeting with my FAA project engineer, his boss and the ACO manager.  We hashed out a program that will really make thigs move.  This was done through a MOU.

Give your ACO a hug!  It goes a long way.

Nigel Waterhouse
Can-Am Aerospace
www.canamaero.com

RE: Working with FAA budget cutbacks

I recently attended the SW Directorate Designee's Conference in DFW and was pretty offended on how they approached this subject.  One speaker plainly said that due to the budget restraints and cut backs that they weren't going to work any new projects, only focus on safety items and AD's (all this was stated with a real attitude) and then he immediately went into how the FAA is customer oriented and has a focus on customer satisfaction.  What a joke.  He also stated how they added more middle management, Get rid of the beauracracy in the FAA and they won't have a budget constraints.

RE: Working with FAA budget cutbacks

(OP)
I have heard many people complain about the LAACO and the lack of project progress they get.  I don't see how they can amke ther statement about not working any new projects, that would illegal as it is stated in the regulations that anyone can apply to the FAA.  AN interesting statement though.  Perhaps you should consider working through Seattle.

Nigel Waterhouse B Eng (Hon's)
Can-Am Aerospace,LLC, Canadian Aircraft Certification Centre
www.canamaero.com

RE: Working with FAA budget cutbacks

We try to work very transparently and openly with the NYACO, and it has paid off to some extent. While it does take some time for our PMA's to get approved, they eventually slog through it. We are in the process of agreeing to an MOU with the NYACO for non-critical items, and they seem quite receptive to delegating limited authority to our DER.

Basically, it comes from building a level of trust with whomever you're dealing with at the ACO. We have a great relationship with everyone at the ACO as well as MIDO. Sure, it would be better if they worked faster, but once you become adversarial, you're asking for trouble. We basically just jump through every hoop they put in front of us.

What we're worried about is the uneven playing field between the ACO's as evidenced by hundreds of PMA's coming out of Atlanta vs. NYACO or LAACO.

I rue the day that a PMA fails and causes an incident. No matter who it happens to will cause the hammer to come down on everyone.

Chris Marinelli
Dynatech Aerospace

RE: Working with FAA budget cutbacks

<Beginning of Rant>

Rant-averse persons, do not read this entry!

The budget is not the only thing reduced at the FAA.  The FAA also has lost much of the experience that was located in the "old hands" at the technical and engineering level.  Some (certainly not all, but a disturbing number) of FAA engineers and technical people are not folks who learned engineering from the ground up.  Some are there simply to fill government quotas.

My point is that to "just jump through every hoop they put in front of us" ensures compliance with bureaucratic paperwork, but it is not always compliance with good engineering judgment and years of experience.

We do many, many PMA's, so we interface constantly with the FAA.  The FAA, like many corporations in America, is slowly being crushed under the weight of "bean counters" taking the place of engineers and technical people.

<End of Rant>

cmarinelli, I admire your company's dedication to compliance with the FAA, but I hope that your company (like ours) is willing to sometimes look deeper than the FAA ACO asks, if you believe the situation warrants.  I hope your DER is an "old hand" with lots of that judgment and experience.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources