×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Question on Wind Loads

Question on Wind Loads

Question on Wind Loads

(OP)
I posted this in the Civil Code Issues, but apparently no one frequents that, so I'll post it here:

This is a quite common situation, but one I'm not familiar with.  How do you calculate the wind load on an irregular structure such as a frame with a sign in it (ex: a sign over a road).  I would think the analysis would, according to ASCE 7-02, be in line with 6.5.13.  My boss isn't comfortable with that since he isn't familiar with this also, and wants me to use the entire area of the frame and the wind load from a simplified analysis (method 1).

RE: Question on Wind Loads

AggieYank,

I do not have a copy of ASCE 7-02 in front of me, but at the very least I would apply the wind load to any portion of the frame which a sign could be mounted to. It would also be prudent to increase this tributary area if the sign could extend beyond the frame.

You may want to have a look at your DOT standards or AASHTO also.

Good luck.

RE: Question on Wind Loads

The reference you are probably looking for is the "Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals".

Wind load is basically applied to the cross sectional area of the frame + the signs.  In addition, there are fatigue criteria for the frame/supports that need to be evaluated due to galloping, vortex shedding, natural wind gusts, and truck induced gusts.

NCHRP Reports 469 and 494 may also be helpful.  Some of the NCHRP reports can be downloaded for free, if I remember correctly, at http://www4.trb.org/

RE: Question on Wind Loads

I think you are correct to use Sec. 6.5.13.  Then use Figure 6-21 to figure the correct Cf value.  Since the flat signboards cover some of the exposed area of the lattice support structure, there is some uncertainty about what value of epsilon to use iln Figure 6-21.  I would use only the parts of the support frame that is not covered by the signs to figure epsilon, figure the Cf value for the frame.  Then figure the Cf value for the signs only by using Figure 6-20.  Note that for most signs, the Cf values will probably be about 1.2 or 1.3.  

As an alternate approach, you could include the frame and sign together to figure epsilon, and probably get a slightly higher epsilon and thus a slightly lower Cf value for the combination signs/frame.  You'd have to ignore the fact that the flat signs are quite different from the flat-sided or round frame members.  With this approach, I'd still suggest using Figure 6-20 to figure Cf for the signs themselves, and apply wind loads to them separately.  


Regards,

chichuck

Its hard to know which approach would give the higher wind loads, but I suspect they would not differ by a lot.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources