×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

(OP)
Hi everybody,

I am working on a full scale roof diaphram model in SAP2000 Nonlinear 8.5.3. The model uses shells to reprensent the steel deck and frame/cable members to reprensent the actual structure below.

To join the two structures, I am trying to use Link Elements. However, I ask myself if I should use Nodal Link elements or elements linking the nodes of the two "strutures", ie the steel deck and the joists below. I am not very familiar with link elements in SAP, so any help would be much appreciated.

My nodes are one on top of the other for the frame and the steel deck. Any suggestions? This is for a linear pushover analysis by the way.

Thanks

RE: Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

Is there such a thing as a linear pushover analysis?? Are you looking for composite action between deck and joists? You might try looking into using constraints which enable you to connect joints in varying degrees of freedom..in other words, you can control which degrees of freedom to link the deck joints with the joist.

RE: Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

(OP)
MasoMenos

Thanks for your input, it helped a lot.

Because you seem to know a lot about constraints, I have a question: I have gap elements between the deck and the joists to prevent any movement of the deck into the frame elements. My frame element is 4" wide, thus i created 3 nodes, all seperated by 2" to reprensent the edges and centerline of the frame member. I assigned a constraint in all directions to these three nodes to simulate the fact that they are on the same frame element. I repeated this method all along the joist. Is this right? Any suggestions?

I have a model which is the same, but without any constraints, and it has a much lower stiffness than that of the previously explained model. I do not understand why this happens.

I hope this is somewhat clear... If not, I will try to insert an image in the next post.

Gracias

RE: Joint Link Elements vs. Connection Link Elements

Mastropower, if you need to model gaps, please understand that constraints don't have them. Think of a constraint as acting like a very rigid beam with no weight which connects between two or more joints. If you link 3 joints, then of course you are making your model stiffer.

I initially thought you were trying to simulate some sort of composite action between the deck and frame elements. If this does not answer your question, then you might try providing some sort of graphic image.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources