×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Current Velocity

Current Velocity

Current Velocity

(OP)
I am trying to model a retaining wall.  The static hydrostatic pressure against the wall is easy to model and simulate.  But!, does anyone have good rule of thumb for modeling the pressure developed due to say a 5mph current pushing against the retaining wall.

Thanks in adance.

Tommy

RE: Current Velocity

For a perpendicular current, add the dynamic pressure, q:

q = 1/2 * rho * V2

rho is mass density (kg/m2), V is velocity (m/s).

RE: Current Velocity

(OP)
A belated thank you very much.

Tommy

RE: Current Velocity

rho should be in Kg/m3 not Kg/m2 - if you're not convinced do a 5 line dimensional analysis.

RE: Current Velocity

(OP)
Thanks,

I caught the dimensional error, I'm sure it was tipograpnical error, when I converted the units to lb/in3 and ft/sec.  

RE: Current Velocity

teb1 ...

make sure you're using MASS density (slug/ft3) rather than the more common weight denisty (lbf/ft3) ...

slug/ft3 = lgf/ft3 / g

RE: Current Velocity

(OP)
Thanks,

I'll have to go back and check that.

teb

RE: Current Velocity

(OP)
Thanks

I did convert the weight density to mass density.

Regards,

teb

RE: Current Velocity

Oy.  When doing these calc's. I always convert to SI, in order to keep my units straight, then convert back to English units.  

RE: Current Velocity

I'm staggered by the way Americans doggedly persist in using archaic unit systems for high technology, often international designs. These systems which you use make your lives a lot harder than is necessary and can lead to serious mistakes. Weight density, mass density - all confusion, and all so unnecessary. In SI density is just what it says on the box. If you want to buy fuel, or vegetables then imperial units are fine but please drop it from aerospace. In fact I feel a thread coming on.....



RE: Current Velocity

(OP)
Dogged persistance has gotten me where I am today and I couldn't be happier.  Most of the individuals that I work with everyday (welders and machinist) in the southern U.S., can't or won't grasp the concept of a kilogram or a meter in their everyday life.

I deal in metric or SI if you will, when I have to, but I am more confortable with english units.

teb1

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources