×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NEHRP 2003 & IBC 200 - Site Specific Analysis

NEHRP 2003 & IBC 200 - Site Specific Analysis

NEHRP 2003 & IBC 200 - Site Specific Analysis

(OP)
I am a geotech trying to understand the requirements for site-specific analysis summarized in the 2003 edition of NEHRP and on the IBC 2000.  The description provided in the NEHRP Chapter 3 Commentary gives a clear approach to obtain a site-specific, "ground" design spectrum.  However, the description provided in Section 3.4 of NEHRP is not that clear, but confusing.  I would appreciate if someone who has used this procedure before could answer a few questions I have:
1) The MCE rock spectrum used to select the input acceleration time histories for the analyses should be that spectrum with a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years according to Section 3.4.  The commentary indicates that the MCE rock spectrum can be, for example, that from a Site Class B rock if a site-specific analysis was not carried out.  Does this mean that if I don't have a 2% in 50 year spectrum I can use the Site Class B rock spectrum?
2) The deterministic MCE ground motion is used instead of the 2% in 50 years MCE spectrum in regions of known active faults when this is lower than the probabilistic.  Does this mean that the spectrum I use to select my input time history accelerations should now be the deterministic for this special case?
3) As described in the commentary, after I obtain a surface design spectrum from an average ratio of response spectra curve and the rock spectrum, do I compare this surface spectrum to the requirements of Section 3.4? i.e. should my surface design spectrum be less than 2/3 of the MCE rock spectrum? Or I shouldn't even be bothering to compute my surface design spectrum as described in the commentary, but use 2/3 of the probabilistic/deterministic MCE?

Any help will be appreciated.

RE: NEHRP 2003 & IBC 200 - Site Specific Analysis

I am not from US so do not know any of your reference codes. But as I understand it, MCE is way much stronger than a "2% probability of exceedance in 50 years" earthquake.

Perhaps, the code is telling you that if you don't have site specific spectrum, just use 2/3 of MCE. This sounds reasonable.

Ciao.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources